Yamaha Discussions about Yamaha ATVs.

Whats better yamaha warrior or Suzuki quadsport.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 05-13-2012, 07:26 PM
StrafeXe's Avatar
Weekend Warrior
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Whats better yamaha warrior or Suzuki quadsport.

The warrior is a 87 and the quadsport is a 86. i can get both for 1200$ What should i get???
 
  #2  
Old 05-14-2012, 11:04 AM
Raptor450's Avatar
Pro Rider
I ride, because football, basketball, and baseball only uses one ball!
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,407
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

$1200 for either one is a lot of money. Unless that Warrior is in mint condition, I would stay away from it, and really I would stay away from ANY of the '87-'89 Warriors, and I'm not a fan of anything Suzuki.
 
  #3  
Old 05-14-2012, 02:38 PM
Scooter86's Avatar
Extreme Pro Rider
Knows Old ATV Questions!
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,127
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

$1200.00 would be on the high end for either one unless it was minty fresh. I am not sure why Raptor450 is against '87-89 Warriors. They were essentially unchanged from the initial offering other than some minor cosmetic changes(light placement.) Even the Raptor 350 is predominately a Warrior at heart with new plastic.

My preference would be towards the Warrior. They are more powerful/faster, have electric start, and have sold a ton more units. Parts are only going to get harder and harder to find for the Qsport, while much of the Warrior mechanicals are still being made by the oem and aftermarket.
 
  #4  
Old 05-14-2012, 08:13 PM
Raptor450's Avatar
Pro Rider
I ride, because football, basketball, and baseball only uses one ball!
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,407
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Scooter86
I am not sure why Raptor450 is against '87-89 Warriors. They were essentially unchanged from the initial offering other than some minor cosmetic changes(light placement.)
Mainly the front a-arms are different than the '90-up Warriors, and every Warrior I've ever seen (or had) needed the front ball joints replaced. It's much easier to find used (or new) a-arms for the '90-up Warriors because they were unchanged even on the Raptor 350's. Plus the swingarm bearing carrier and chain adjustment design on the '87-89 was a poor design. But I imagine a "90-up swingram would bolt right up to the '87 chassis. Not to mention any other used parts (fenders, lights, etc) that would be easier to find that were basically unchanged all the way up to 2004 that will not bolt directly to the '87-89.

Not sure how the prices are in your area, but here in NC I see Raptor 350's for $1400 - 1800 all the time. Here's a good example: ***price reduced***2004 raptor 350 se. The Raptor 350 is the same as a Warrior with a few updates and Raptor-style plastics.
 
  #5  
Old 05-17-2012, 11:55 AM
Nelson's Avatar
Trailblazer
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

warrior for sure
 
  #6  
Old 05-17-2012, 02:24 PM
beastlywarrior228's Avatar
Pro Rider
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Warrior by far actually the 87 had replacable ball joints so that solves that issue
 
  #7  
Old 05-25-2012, 11:08 PM
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

the engine was moved back in the frame in the early 90's too. unless you are a big guy id suggest looking at 300ex's too
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Reactant
General Chat
15
03-30-2022 02:08 AM
STLyamwar
Classifieds, Garage Sale & Swap Shop
1
07-25-2020 04:44 AM
manuelrivera
Yamaha
2
08-08-2015 04:34 PM
suzukiquadrunner1987
Yamaha
0
08-06-2015 05:29 PM
Ashley S
Yamaha
5
07-31-2015 09:46 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: Whats better yamaha warrior or Suzuki quadsport.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:01 AM.