I am looking to buy an ATV in the next few days. I am either getting an automatic 2003 Arctic Cat or 2003 Suzuki. I have chosen these because I can get an excellent price on either of them. I live in Newfoundland which is a mixture of mud, rock, and bog. I plan to use the ATV in the winter(we get quite a lot of snow). I know they both have the same engine, but I have a number of other questions regarding the different models. If you have owned or ridden one of these machines please feel free to comment on the following:

1) Should I go 400 or 500? Is it worth the extra $$?
2) Do you find the Arctic Cat less stable in turns and at speed due to higher center of gravity?
3) Is the ride that much better on the AC due to its independent rear suspension?
4) I read that the AC 4 wheel drive is better than Suzuki. Yes /No?
5) The AC's are heavier machines. Are they more durable? Are they more sluggish?
6) Reliability/Durability
7) Resale value?

Many reviews I have read have put Suzuki near the top of the pack and Arctic Cat near the bottom. Please let me know some of you experiences.

 

I have rode a 400 arctic cat i realy liked it lots of power and a very smoth ride. Suzuki's are nice to but i haven't rode a new one.
1) go with the 500
2)there are pretty stable
3)yes the ac is a very nice ride
4)i would say they are the same.
5)they are really durable because a was driving a arctic cat and jumping it and playing around, i would say they have alot of power
6)they are very reliable and durable. we went riding with a guy that went 120 miles on 1 tank of gas
7)?
They are both good machines