kfx 400 vs. honda sporttrax400 vs warrior
#2
Well both of those machines are faster, quicker, and handle better than the warrior. Kawisukicats come first, followed by the honda 400ex and then the warrior.
With a good rider either of these machines should be faster in the trails, tight or otherwise.
With a good rider either of these machines should be faster in the trails, tight or otherwise.
#7
Originally posted by: omahapredator
top speed it's on the warrior 6speed sshouuld say it all! that's based of stock!
top speed it's on the warrior 6speed sshouuld say it all! that's based of stock!
I own 2 of the three, Warrior and a Z, and each serves its own purpose. But there is no way a Warrior has a higher top speed, not even close.
As for 0-20, the better rider will determine between the 400EX and the Z, but if both are equal, the Z by a very slight margine. 20mph does not take long to reach...
Trending Topics
#9
You must not be reading any of the tests done by all of the magazines. The Warrier/Raptor is not even tested with the quads that you listed. They have dropped it down and tested it againest the 300ex and the Honda beat the new 350 Raptor in eveything but the drag race.
Of the "SPORT" quads out right now the Suz/Kaw is the best, then Artic Cat, and then the new 400ex. this is for 2005 models.
You are going to like this, because you have a warrier and think that what you have must be the best.
Of the "SPORT" quads out right now the Suz/Kaw is the best, then Artic Cat, and then the new 400ex. this is for 2005 models.
You are going to like this, because you have a warrier and think that what you have must be the best.
#10
Originally posted by: rolsmojave3
who cares about top speed anyway...i can gear a mojave to do 120..(might take a week to get there but..lol) so if you want fast all you have to do is buy a sprocket
who cares about top speed anyway...i can gear a mojave to do 120..(might take a week to get there but..lol) so if you want fast all you have to do is buy a sprocket


