Hey guys im looking between the eiger and outlander 400. My bro has an eiger auto and its pretty nice for the price.
But i was wanting something with a little more speed and better suspension. How do you guys compare you outlanders
to other 400's?

 

Hey guys im looking between the eiger and outlander 400. My bro has an eiger auto and its pretty nice for the price.
But i was wanting something with a little more speed and better suspension. How do you guys compare you outlanders
to other 400's?
>>>>>>>>>>>

I personally havent ridden a Suzuki although I'm leaning toward a KQ. I think the Oultander IRS is better but only from looking at them, not riding. From what I see, Suzuki seems to offer the best overall value. The 400 is a HO engine with four valves, don't know if that factors into your decision at all, they are pretty powerful. I have a lady friend who rides mine and has no problems at all and she is a beginner.

 

I have a outlander 400 2up and my girlfriend has the eiger 400 automatic. My outlander is a bit faster even being a 2up. Its suspension is far better alot smoother. Her Eiger is is decent, it shifts into gear alot better than the outlander. Its far lighter and steers better.(shorter) I think the Eiger is a really good deal for the money. Overall value its the Outlander. My girlfriends brother has the Eiger 5 speed clutchless which is alot more usefull. There both good bike just depends on how much your willing to spend.