Honda Discussions about Honda ATVs.

Foreman 400 or Rancher ,which one has a better ride?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 21, 2001 | 01:51 PM
  #1  
Tim1's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Pro Rider
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,474
Likes: 0
Default

My friend is finally getting rid of a 89 2wd Yamaha Moto4.We just came back from the dealer and it came down to a 2001 non-es Rancher(FourTrax350) or a 2000 Foreman 400 with floorboards for $400 more.This guy could care less about speed and uses it mostly for Hunting and fishing.His old moto4 was capable of hauling what he wanted but he wants 4wd so both Hondas will do what he wants of them.The dealer said they both have a good ride because the Ranches has more travel in the suspesion but the Foreman has a longer wheel base which helps it out.It come down to the price and the ride qualitity to make up his mind.
 
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2001 | 11:22 PM
  #2  
idahorancher's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Default

I'm assuming the 400 with floorboards must be ES? Tell your buddy to save the $400 and buy the Rancher with the surtrac differential.
 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2001 | 12:34 AM
  #3  
goattrotter's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
Default

The rancher has a better every thing.
 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2001 | 12:45 AM
  #4  
Tim1's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Pro Rider
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,474
Likes: 0
Default

The 400s have no ES,he is dead set against it anyways.
 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2001 | 01:48 AM
  #5  
alaskaweasel's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Default

Tim1: I might get a little flack for this, but I personally like the Rancher better. However the Rancher to me even with more travel is rougher riding in my opinion. If your just riding around and hauling etc. the 400 would be this guys ticket. It will pull, and do it with a bit more ease than the Rancher. However if he is flying around jumping and hitting deep ruts, the Rancher will be better riding due to longer travel. To sum it up, the Rancher is a sportier ride compared to the 400 in my experience. Hope this helps,later.
Scott
 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2001 | 07:05 AM
  #6  
trailboss450's Avatar
Pro Rider
25 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
Default

The Rancher also has more ground clearance if that matters to him!
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2001 | 01:44 AM
  #7  
goattrotter's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
Default

I agree 100 % to that.
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2001 | 03:03 AM
  #8  
Foreman4x4's Avatar
Range Rover
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Default

I just sold my 96 Foreman 400 and bought a 2001 Rancher ES 4x4. My 400 was a great machine other than it rode rough. I haven't got a whole lot of saddle time on the Rancher but I believe it rides better than the Foreman 400. I also wanted the floorboards and digital display. The 400 does have more torque but it seems to come mostly from lower gearing. I've put 30 miles on my Rancher so far and it doesn't seem to lack for power. I think the Foreman 400 is the ultimate pure "utility" machine where the Rancher is more of a "sport utility" machine. You can't go wrong with either one and until the 28th there are some pretty good deals to be had.
 
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2001 | 12:17 PM
  #9  
snowshark's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 2,123
Likes: 0
Default

The Foreman 400 is a utility quad, not sporty at all. The Rancher is faster, better handling, better differential, more ground clearance, its utility & sporty. The Rancher is new technology, the Foreman 400 is old.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Scottma518
Honda
4
Jul 16, 2015 09:19 PM
honda71
Honda
4
Jul 12, 2015 05:56 AM
RedRancher
Yamaha
10
Jul 10, 2015 06:36 PM
Scottma518
Buying an ATV
10
Jul 10, 2015 12:42 AM
honda71
Other ATV Topics
0
Jul 8, 2015 02:13 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:17 AM.