why doesn't yamaha put........
#2
The Warrior is an entry level sport/utility 2WD. With a 426, it would become a turbo superjet that would dust a Craptor.
A new full racer 426, why not, a 426 Warrior, I don't think so (too much power to handle...and too expensive).
A new full racer 426, why not, a 426 Warrior, I don't think so (too much power to handle...and too expensive).
#7
By the time the engine was de-tuned for the quad, the horsepower would be about the same as the Raptor or Banshee and would have the same power delivery as the Banshee. Then Yamaha would have 2 quads appealing to the exact same audience. Definately not good marketing strategy.
Trending Topics
#8
maybe it would be a bad marketing strategy but you also have to think about the kodiak and big bears being both 400 class quads....not smart....and i highly doubt that it would be faster then the raptor.....theres no way you can compare a dirt bike to a quad
#9
You guys mentioned the dirt bike to quad comparisson. Thats hard to do. I have a DRZ400 and have not found a quad yet that can catch it.
one rear tire= way less mass to turn than the 2 rear quad tires. I think the top speed on my 400 is somewhere around 90mph(it's still stock). Not extremely fast( I know) But I get there so much quicker.
Like mentioned above.... It's hard to find a bike that won't beat a quad. the power to weight is incredible.
one rear tire= way less mass to turn than the 2 rear quad tires. I think the top speed on my 400 is somewhere around 90mph(it's still stock). Not extremely fast( I know) But I get there so much quicker.
Like mentioned above.... It's hard to find a bike that won't beat a quad. the power to weight is incredible.


