Polaris Discussions about Polaris ATVs.

smaller but heavier tires

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 27, 2013 | 01:52 PM
  #1  
mad-atver's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Range Rover
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
From: Manitoba, Canada
Default smaller but heavier tires

i found a good deal on some barely used 25" kenda executioner tires, but i heard these tires are a little heavy. i have 26" factory tires on it now but will i lose much performance putting a smaller size, heavier tire on? anyone have experience with these tires?
 
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2013 | 02:17 PM
  #2  
user493's Avatar
Moto Psycho
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,747
Likes: 3
From: Michigan
Default

The smaller diameter will cut 4% off of your top speed. I don't know how the weight will affect anything.
 
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2013 | 02:49 PM
  #3  
mad-atver's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Range Rover
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
From: Manitoba, Canada
Default

thanks for the reply. i don't mind if it cuts my top speed, i just want to know if my sportsman 500 will have enough torque to spin the heavier tires as good as the old ones.
 
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2013 | 04:46 PM
  #4  
mad-atver's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Range Rover
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
From: Manitoba, Canada
Default

the rear executioners might be 26lbs versus my old tires being only 20lbs, does 6lbs more for each tire make a big difference?
 
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2013 | 07:00 PM
  #5  
Mud Slinger's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
From: Springfield, OH
Default

I put them on my king quad 400. I noticed quite a difference in power when doing long climbs at hatfield McCoy. Quad would really wind out by the top of the climb. With that said, that was a 400 compared to your 500. I think you will be completely fine to go to the Kendas. They are a great mud tire and decent trail tire.
 
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2013 | 10:29 PM
  #6  
mad-atver's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Range Rover
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
From: Manitoba, Canada
Default

i hope its good, i can't wait to try them
 
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2013 | 09:18 AM
  #7  
jgar's Avatar
Extreme Pro Rider
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,971
Likes: 0
From: Gardner ma.
Default

Bigger tires (taller) give you more speed but less torque. Shorter tires give you more torque but less speed.
 
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2013 | 09:37 AM
  #8  
mad-atver's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Range Rover
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
From: Manitoba, Canada
Default

thanks for the replys
 
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2013 | 09:53 AM
  #9  
TLC's Avatar
TLC
Extreme Pro Rider
God forbid he lets the polishing secret out!
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 11,805
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by mad-atver
the rear executioners might be 26lbs versus my old tires being only 20lbs, does 6lbs more for each tire make a big difference?
Never heard of a 26" rear tires that only weights 20lbs are they one ply?. My two ply 25"X10 junk tires on my grizzly weigh more then that (22lbs).



Mudlites which are known for there good weight have a weight of 25"x10 (23lbs) and 26"X10(24lbs).There thinner 25"x8" fronts weigh 20lbs.

You may want to look up the true specs of your (20lb) 26" X11 Polaris PXT tires . You may find the your new 25" tires are lighter not heavier.

I have the same though, I,m thinking about putting 26" Mudlites on my 350 Grizzly but wonder what my top end loss will be.
 
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2013 | 02:42 PM
  #10  
mad-atver's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Range Rover
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
From: Manitoba, Canada
Default

yeah i'll try and find the actual specs maybe i was thinking of the carlisle at489 stock tires?
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:09 PM.