Yamaha Discussions about Yamaha ATVs.

New 40HP PRO-X blaster cylinder in the works...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 8, 2001 | 12:07 AM
  #1  
mxracer27's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Range Rover
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Default

the owner of ctracing.com told me in a few weeks they're releasing a blaster cylinder that uses a honda reed cage and makes over 40HP when used with a 38mm carb. man this thing is giong to be awsome
 
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2001 | 12:38 AM
  #2  
brokemybanshee's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,392
Likes: 0
Default

40 is ALOT for a blaster, what exactly is this cylinder? Need more info!
 
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2001 | 10:31 AM
  #3  
dirt817's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Default

And their probly going to charge like $2000+ for the whole setup. It is going to be pretty cool, though. Kinda ruins my project. Brokemy knows what I'm talking about.

I have some pics of my parts up on my site under the "parts" page. It might take a while to load the viewer, but it is good enough. More pics later today.
 
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2001 | 10:40 AM
  #4  
dirt817's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Default

Another thing... If it is a big-bore I have no interest in it. Sure, the big-bore sounds good, but it revs slower and doesn't last as long between rebuilds. I will be making close to 40hp(probly 35-38hp) while using standard bore sizes. It's on it's second bore(.020 over) right now, but it needs bored to about .030 over. Mine is going to rev quicker, last longer, and have a huge powerband(thank you very much YPVS). The only real problem to mine or CT's setup is a place to mount the radiator. I'm still working on that one!
 
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2001 | 02:55 PM
  #5  
peterbilt's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Default

That assuming that the ct set-up is liquid cooled!
 
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2001 | 03:19 PM
  #6  
dirt817's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Default

It is. I have heard of this before. Besides, all the pro-x cylinders are big-bore liquid-cooled. It supposed to be like a 240-265cc.
 
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2001 | 09:47 PM
  #7  
mxracer27's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Range Rover
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Default

the cylinder costs 800 with a 250r reed cage(much better then yamaha)i still dont know how many cc's and if its LC
 
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2001 | 11:13 PM
  #8  
scottd's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
Default

A Blaster with 40hp...with that chassis...now that's scary! At what point do you call it cost prohibitive??? For cryin' out loud, just take the same amount of money and upgrade to a Banshee!!
 
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2001 | 02:41 AM
  #9  
Kiwi_Craig's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 239
Likes: 1
Default

[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-happy.gif[/img]

whilst i'm sure the Pro-x will be a quality piece what are they doing about the water pump etc?? and does it have a powervalve.........

Have a look at the DT200 microfiche on my site for how Yamaha set up the watercooled powervalved engine in 85, this engine was the basis from which the blaster was derived......... minus all the good bits.........

http://www.geocities.com/kiwi_craig/index.htm

Kiwi

 
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2001 | 10:09 AM
  #10  
sAyIt_fmf's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 1,538
Likes: 0
Default

I think it is great that some of you are taking the time and effort to try to make a liquid cooled blaster. Or at least one with more power.
What do you guys plan on doing for a frame? And other components? I would think that a blaster with 40 or more horses would cause a bit of damage to stock components.
With my main concern being the frame and swing. I could be wrong...I'm not sure how much a blaster will handle. But 40hp is a far cry from stock.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:55 PM.