New 40HP PRO-X blaster cylinder in the works...
#3
And their probly going to charge like $2000+ for the whole setup. It is going to be pretty cool, though. Kinda ruins my project. Brokemy knows what I'm talking about.
I have some pics of my parts up on my site under the "parts" page. It might take a while to load the viewer, but it is good enough. More pics later today.
I have some pics of my parts up on my site under the "parts" page. It might take a while to load the viewer, but it is good enough. More pics later today.
#4
Another thing... If it is a big-bore I have no interest in it. Sure, the big-bore sounds good, but it revs slower and doesn't last as long between rebuilds. I will be making close to 40hp(probly 35-38hp) while using standard bore sizes. It's on it's second bore(.020 over) right now, but it needs bored to about .030 over. Mine is going to rev quicker, last longer, and have a huge powerband(thank you very much YPVS). The only real problem to mine or CT's setup is a place to mount the radiator. I'm still working on that one!
#7
the cylinder costs 800 with a 250r reed cage(much better then yamaha)i still dont know how many cc's and if its LC
Trending Topics
#9
[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-happy.gif[/img]
whilst i'm sure the Pro-x will be a quality piece what are they doing about the water pump etc?? and does it have a powervalve.........
Have a look at the DT200 microfiche on my site for how Yamaha set up the watercooled powervalved engine in 85, this engine was the basis from which the blaster was derived......... minus all the good bits.........
http://www.geocities.com/kiwi_craig/index.htm
Kiwi
whilst i'm sure the Pro-x will be a quality piece what are they doing about the water pump etc?? and does it have a powervalve.........
Have a look at the DT200 microfiche on my site for how Yamaha set up the watercooled powervalved engine in 85, this engine was the basis from which the blaster was derived......... minus all the good bits.........
http://www.geocities.com/kiwi_craig/index.htm
Kiwi
#10
I think it is great that some of you are taking the time and effort to try to make a liquid cooled blaster. Or at least one with more power.
What do you guys plan on doing for a frame? And other components? I would think that a blaster with 40 or more horses would cause a bit of damage to stock components.
With my main concern being the frame and swing. I could be wrong...I'm not sure how much a blaster will handle. But 40hp is a far cry from stock.
What do you guys plan on doing for a frame? And other components? I would think that a blaster with 40 or more horses would cause a bit of damage to stock components.
With my main concern being the frame and swing. I could be wrong...I'm not sure how much a blaster will handle. But 40hp is a far cry from stock.


