Polaris Discussions about Polaris ATVs.

2002 scrammy 5004x4 vs 2002 scrammy 400X 4x4

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 22, 2001 | 10:35 PM
  #1  
bigblock's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Weekend Warrior
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Default

[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/img]I currently own a 2002 scrambler 500 4x4 and I am wondering what the difference between the two are? I am thinking of trading for the 400 and wondering which one is faster in a race and how do they differ on trail riding? I know that the 400x weighs 503lbs and the 500HO weighs 559lbs so I think that this alone should make a difference. I would appreciate any advice or suggestions.
 
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2001 | 10:44 PM
  #2  
RecycledBodies's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Default

the Scrambler 500 4x4 gos 65 on black top and looses like 3mph on dirt or whatever why would u wanna go faster then that with a utility quad? I think the 400 is 2 stroke but I dunno I only concentrate on the 500
 
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2001 | 10:57 PM
  #3  
OffRder15's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 1,733
Likes: 0
Default

We get this post all the time. Stock for stock both the 500 4 stroke and the 400 2 stroke are about the same. But, when wanting more speed, 2 strokes are easier to modify. You can get much more gain from adding a pipe to a 2 stroke than a 4 stroke. To me, it's just a matter of preference. Two strokes are faster, but are not as easy to maintain (ex. more changing spark plugs, rebuilds).
 
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2001 | 11:23 PM
  #4  
OhioScrambler's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
Default

I would have to agree with OffRder15. The four strokes are much easier to mantain. But main do I hate change the spark plug
 
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2001 | 11:46 PM
  #5  
bermbanger400's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Default

well look at this way the scram 400x maybe your last cahnce to get a 2 stroke i just dont see them lasting much longer. also the 400 is just as reliable as the 500 i have only put 1 plug in mine in 6 months.
 
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2001 | 11:57 PM
  #6  
Kelly's Avatar
Weekend Warrior
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Default

I would have to agree with OffRder15. The four strokes are much easier to mantain. But main do I hate change the spark plug

I know dat's right! I haven't decided if I'd rather drill a hole in the gas tank or pull the head off it for access! Still, although it's harder to hotrod, I'll take a 4 banger. If nothing else, just longevity.
 
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2001 | 09:50 AM
  #7  
walexa's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
Default

The spark plug issue on the 2-stroke is nothing like the 500 4-stroke. The plug sits up on top......easy to access.....even without pulling side panels or anything. I've had a sp500, and it has the same engine as the scrambler 500..........the plug is recessed deep into the top of the engine. Not only is it hard to get to, sometimes it is really difficult to get the boot off the plug.

As far as which one is more reliable........that is definitely a toss-up. I believe I'd rather take the 2-stroke. As long as the air filter is kept clean and the oil tank kept full, I believe you could get just as many miles without major maintenance as the 500. On the 4-stroke, they are notorious for eating cams, you have to change the oil, and the water pump seal is more likely to go out (my experience anyway).

So, that being said.........it's really just a matter of preference......4-stroke or 2-stroke.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
95wolv
Honda
7
Sep 27, 2024 12:00 PM
Hack714
Introduce Yourself
6
Oct 6, 2015 06:51 AM
Hack714
General Chat
2
Sep 26, 2015 08:11 AM
Hack714
Buying an ATV
11
Sep 20, 2015 05:54 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:26 AM.