rancher or rubicon
#2
Well, that depends on what you will be using it for. There is a lot of difference in the engine size and the price. I don't care much for autos myself, but after driving the Rubicon I have changed my mind (which also has ESP). But it really does depend on what you will use it for. Myself, I used the 400 for just about everything, trails, mountains, farm work, plowing snow, playing. Though it doesn't have much ground clearance (lift kit took care of that) I wouldn't trade it for anything. I am happy with it. I ride with 2 Ranchers, 1 450, and 1 Rubicon on the trails and they all handle them well. Hope this kinda helps[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-confused.gif[/img]
#3
I own a Rubicon and will pick up a new 4-wd Rancher ES this week for my daughters so they can go with my wife and I. If money is not the deciding factor, it is like deciding betrween a Ford Ranger PU and a F-350 diesel. Sure the Ranger will get you there, but the diesel is bigger, tougher, roomier, more powerful, and a full list of differences. Both are good, machines, but if you like the Rubicon, don't buy a Rancher.
#4
Well lets see, Ranchers will go just as far as a Rubicon, are lighter and easier to drive and are more reliable besides being about $4000 cheaper. Besides, my Rancher will *@#*ing eat anything you buy Nicholas!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 2002 Rancher for life baby, oh yeah!!!!!!!!!!
#7
$4000 cheaper? Check your math again.
I didn't care for auto's either. I replaced a 400 Foreman with a Rubicon and I LOVE IT!!!!!! That bike is just great. Aside from the gas milage/small tank I don't have a bad thing to say about the Rubicon.
I don't think you would either.
I didn't care for auto's either. I replaced a 400 Foreman with a Rubicon and I LOVE IT!!!!!! That bike is just great. Aside from the gas milage/small tank I don't have a bad thing to say about the Rubicon.
I don't think you would either.


