wondering about 400ex
#1
i'm deciding between a warrior and a 400ex and i need to know which is better for what i do. i ride in deep mud i do alot of trail racing and i love to climb hills so which would be better and serious about it please.
#2
As for mud riding, they both suck cause of the ground clearence, but as for as climbing, i think i do like the warrior better,they seem like they have more in the front end to hold ya down, if your not gonna be doing any wheely riding get the warrior, thats is the only thing i see wrong with the 350, they aint quite got the weight balanced like the honda for riding on the back wheels. Thats just what i think, i can be wrong on some things.
#4
Buy a 400 they are great all around sport quads. I have a friend that has a warrior and he wishes that he would have bought the 400. As for the mud um... go fast or buy a 4x4 and trails 400 is awesome has great handling and hills 400 can climb get but u gotta learn how to ride it up hills first or u might end up with a 400 on top of you.
#6
I ride in Central PA and probably some of the conditions are similar. I think the Warrior is a smaller machine. If you're tall like me the 400EX is a better fit. I'm a loyal Honda guy so of course my vote is for the 400EX.
#7
400EX definately. I have a friend who owns a 98 warrior and another friend who owns a 00,400EX. The 400EX wheelies so much easier. They're not really mud machines...........if u wanna go nutz in the mud go buy a quadzilla. They're good at everything except the honda has better handeling. If you've already narrowed your choice down between the 400EX and warrior,I'd take the honda,just my opinion.
Icav
Icav
Trending Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)



