which is over all better to you, 300ex or 350 warrior?
#2
There hasnt been a flame for awhile and this just might start another. There has been posts like this many times and ill say my point of view again. The Warrior is old,outdated design and could have alot more potential,but Doesnt,it is also heavy compared to the hondas. The 300EX is lighter,not as fast but has the potential,better handeling and some reports of better suspension. The cons on the 300 are few the metal gas tank and reverse procedure. I'm NOT going to say the warrior is a bad machine ,but in my view the 300ex is better.
P.S LET THE FLAME BEGIN
P.S LET THE FLAME BEGIN
#3
LET ME GET THE FIRE WOOD!!
the warrior is a good machine if you want a quad that can be fun, and greatly modded. I do agree with honda guy for it being outdated, but is has a proven motor and is very dependable.
as for the 300ex, i seldom hear bad things about them but i think the motor is too small and not as fast as the warrior. the only advantage would have to be the lighter front end and the better suspension.
Just remember, upgrades can be made.
i'm sticking with the old but greatly dependable warrior.
the warrior is a good machine if you want a quad that can be fun, and greatly modded. I do agree with honda guy for it being outdated, but is has a proven motor and is very dependable.
as for the 300ex, i seldom hear bad things about them but i think the motor is too small and not as fast as the warrior. the only advantage would have to be the lighter front end and the better suspension.
Just remember, upgrades can be made.
i'm sticking with the old but greatly dependable warrior.
#7


