Honda Discussions about Honda ATVs.

which is over all better to you, 300ex or 350 warrior?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 29, 2002 | 08:49 PM
  #1  
redriderman's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Range Rover
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Default

yeah i'v been hearing lots of comotion what is better, personally i think 300's are better, but i might change my mind from your guys differen't point of view.
 
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2002 | 09:27 PM
  #2  
HondaGuy300EX's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Default

There hasnt been a flame for awhile and this just might start another. There has been posts like this many times and ill say my point of view again. The Warrior is old,outdated design and could have alot more potential,but Doesnt,it is also heavy compared to the hondas. The 300EX is lighter,not as fast but has the potential,better handeling and some reports of better suspension. The cons on the 300 are few the metal gas tank and reverse procedure. I'm NOT going to say the warrior is a bad machine ,but in my view the 300ex is better.


P.S LET THE FLAME BEGIN
 
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2002 | 09:35 PM
  #3  
perrya's Avatar
Range Rover
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Default

LET ME GET THE FIRE WOOD!!

the warrior is a good machine if you want a quad that can be fun, and greatly modded. I do agree with honda guy for it being outdated, but is has a proven motor and is very dependable.

as for the 300ex, i seldom hear bad things about them but i think the motor is too small and not as fast as the warrior. the only advantage would have to be the lighter front end and the better suspension.

Just remember, upgrades can be made.
i'm sticking with the old but greatly dependable warrior.
 
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2002 | 10:22 PM
  #4  
HondaGuy300EX's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Default

Very true only if the 300 actually had a 300cc motor then it would be better then the warrior.The Warrior maybe a good machine ,but the 300ex beats it in maybe one aspect SPEED.
 
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2002 | 10:28 PM
  #5  
350rcherdude's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Default

keep the ATC's alive if you want 4 stroke torque get a 350X. throw that in to the fire.
 
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2002 | 11:09 PM
  #6  
HondaGuy300EX's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Default

The 350x is the 300EX so everything that is said about the 300 also applies to a 350X.
 
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2002 | 11:30 PM
  #7  
RiverRat440's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Default

hondaguy300ex,,,,,,,,ummmmmmm...no.. the 300ex and 350x are absolutley not the same.
 
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2002 | 11:41 PM
  #8  
HondaGuy300EX's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Default

What is the replica of the 300ex then?
 
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2002 | 11:44 PM
  #9  
RiverRat440's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Default

man, the 300ex was built and designed off of the 250x. it's the same dang thang, only electric start and a longer stroke to bump up the cc's
 
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2002 | 11:44 PM
  #10  
redriderman's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Range Rover
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Default

yeah the 300 is so much lighter and easier to pop a wheelie. i rod my friends last week than hopped on mine, the 300 feels better to me. just my opinion though
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:45 AM.