head pipe question?
Sep 16, 2002 | 12:18 AM
#2
The Facility
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,062
Likes: 1
From: Mississippi
It's not any bigger than stock, but it stays as two headpipes longer than the stocker before it meets the silencer.
I have rode a couple with them and didn't notice any "seat of the pants" difference. I haven't seen any dyno numbers that show the difference. Maybe you can find a member here who has done that.
The 2003 Cannondales have a head pipe that is very similar to the HMF header pipe offered for the 2001 and 2002 models, but to put an HMF on a 2003 requires the full HMF system....$450.00
I have rode a couple with them and didn't notice any "seat of the pants" difference. I haven't seen any dyno numbers that show the difference. Maybe you can find a member here who has done that.
The 2003 Cannondales have a head pipe that is very similar to the HMF header pipe offered for the 2001 and 2002 models, but to put an HMF on a 2003 requires the full HMF system....$450.00
Sep 16, 2002 | 12:47 AM
#3
Weekend Warrior
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Raptorkiller
The Head Pipe is good for 2-3 HP on the Low end and 3-4 hp more in the Mid.This is above what the HMF Silencer makes.The Full System makes about 1/2 to 1 HP more on the Top end.AS you can see the Head Pipe does its job in the Low and Mid Range.
The Head Pipe is good for 2-3 HP on the Low end and 3-4 hp more in the Mid.This is above what the HMF Silencer makes.The Full System makes about 1/2 to 1 HP more on the Top end.AS you can see the Head Pipe does its job in the Low and Mid Range.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)