Honda Discussions about Honda ATVs.

Pro-X CT 310 cylinder vs stock 250R cylinder

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 12-03-2001, 07:20 PM
Keenan's Avatar
Trailblazer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I just recently compared the two cylinders on my 250R and the results were surprising to say the least. I've had my CT 310 Pro-X cylinder for awhile now and was very pleased with it. But since I installed the cylinder as a kit with midrange pipe, FMF Ram Valve, reed block spacer and bigger Keihin PJ carb, I couldn't help but be curious how the mods on the stock cylinder would do. In other words, how much difference did the $900 cylinder actually make. The Pro-X cylinder, while a thing of beauty, does very little. The only difference is the stock cylinder has a little less torque and revs a little faster while the Pro-X cylinder is just the opposite. I had the Pro-X ported for midrange by CT and there is quite a bit of difference in the ports. I must say that I was quite dissappointed. Anyone else have the same experience?
 
  #2  
Old 12-03-2001, 08:17 PM
seanl's Avatar
Trailblazer
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It is a well known fact that CT does a very poor job of porting. In fact they hardly port at all. They only "match" the sleeve to the barrel. Ask someone who has an esr, sparks, macdizzy ect... ported cylinder how they like it. You will be shocked to say the least. As I write this letter Macdizzy a.k.a Rick, is porting my pro-x 310 cylinder. I cant wait till i get it!!!!
sean
 
  #3  
Old 12-03-2001, 09:53 PM
jdtrx310's Avatar
Weekend Warrior
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I also bought a 310 pro-x kit from ct that was supposedly mx ported but it is only good for top end. It is like a lightswitch-no low end power at all. I hope to get it rectified this winter. I just hope the ports are not messed up already. Any esr comments out there on their 310 pro-x cylinder work? Thanks
 
  #4  
Old 12-03-2001, 11:35 PM
ridzhard's Avatar
Pro Rider
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have an ESR 310 with TRX9 porting and the mid-range/top end pipe. Also has a 38 mm Air Stryker and a CR intake, reed cage and reeds. I run a K & N with the air box lid off. The porting is a true work of art, and it is very, very fast. It has great power and is very ridable from mid range on up to a crazy top end.
I also have an 86 that has a Duncan ported motor. It runs a Delta V-force type intake and has a Paul Turner race pipe. It had a stock carb taper bored to 37 mm, but it just did not pull off the bottom like I wanted so I put a stock carb back on. It runs very good. Much like the ESR motor, just less everywhere. It is a fast bike, but the 310 is head and shoulders above it. With all else being equal, I firmly believe that there is no replacement, for displacement.
 
  #5  
Old 12-04-2001, 09:44 AM
Dill's Avatar
Pro Rider
Join Date: Jul 1999
Posts: 749
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

it just seems to me that a well ported 250-265 is just about as fast as a 310, and revs faster too.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Alex Rodak
ATV Videos
2
09-13-2015 12:30 AM
Alex Rodak
Yamaha
0
09-12-2015 09:39 AM
Alex Rodak
Introduce Yourself
0
09-11-2015 11:42 PM
Steeldon
Utility ATVs
0
09-05-2015 09:38 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: Pro-X CT 310 cylinder vs stock 250R cylinder



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:50 PM.