LT80 owners - don't forget about the clutch
#17
1) So...I'm not allowed to discuss the details of my motor build other than saying it has "Moore" HP and clutch work! I rebuilt it from the ground up and PC'd the cases...
2) The LT80 frame needed some help in the front suspension area...so I grafted an '86 LT250R front end to it...it weighs in a bit more, but gives it all the benefits of double A-arms/disk brakes/front wheel options/more travel...without being ridiculously wide (like some other...cough...300ex...cough...conversions...coug h...I've seen...)
Just need to PC the frame & other parts, then re-assemble (had to build an oven and booth for the frame...I must be )
2) The LT80 frame needed some help in the front suspension area...so I grafted an '86 LT250R front end to it...it weighs in a bit more, but gives it all the benefits of double A-arms/disk brakes/front wheel options/more travel...without being ridiculously wide (like some other...cough...300ex...cough...conversions...coug h...I've seen...)
Just need to PC the frame & other parts, then re-assemble (had to build an oven and booth for the frame...I must be )
#18
#20
In my opinion more HP without chassis updates is a disaster waiting to happen. In stock form the LT80 has plenty of punch for a mini...my son got used to that power pretty quickly and started opening the throttle...unfortunately, the stock chassis wasn't up to the challenge. We were tooling down a railroad bed with small whoops...I was driving behind him and could see is *** being bucked off the seat and the front end pitching left & right. For the rear end I settled on a Fox Float shock and left the travel stock...I could visually see 1/2" being used (my son would need to be 150+lbs to achieve full stroke on the stock setup...he's 70lb). The Fox Float will provide superior travel usage and is fully adjustable.
The issue with the front end is a little more problematic...it's a single a-arm...meaning camber changes significantly when the suspension is moved through its stroke (recall all snowmobiles had trailing arm front ends...now all have double a-arms...main reason was tracking issues through rough terrain)...only way to fix this was to change the front-end completely. Thought about that one a lot before settling on the early years (85 & 86) for the LT250R front end. Many pros and only one con (weight)...of course getting it on there was interesting, but I managed without too much original frame modification. Benefits are:
1) Stability - front end is +6 over stock, rear end will get +5 (wheel spacers)
2) Handling - since it's faster, it needs to handle the terrain better and corner flatter
3) Brakes - disk brakes now...more whoa for Moore's go!
My son really enjoyed the quad's power in stock form, but flat out told me it needed work in the handling/ride departments...so, off to work I went, but of course I had to add Moore power as well
The issue with the front end is a little more problematic...it's a single a-arm...meaning camber changes significantly when the suspension is moved through its stroke (recall all snowmobiles had trailing arm front ends...now all have double a-arms...main reason was tracking issues through rough terrain)...only way to fix this was to change the front-end completely. Thought about that one a lot before settling on the early years (85 & 86) for the LT250R front end. Many pros and only one con (weight)...of course getting it on there was interesting, but I managed without too much original frame modification. Benefits are:
1) Stability - front end is +6 over stock, rear end will get +5 (wheel spacers)
2) Handling - since it's faster, it needs to handle the terrain better and corner flatter
3) Brakes - disk brakes now...more whoa for Moore's go!
My son really enjoyed the quad's power in stock form, but flat out told me it needed work in the handling/ride departments...so, off to work I went, but of course I had to add Moore power as well