scrambler400(4x4), xplorer400
#2
I think these are some reasons:
heavier, with the racks and excess fenders
transmision, I don't know technically what but I know the explorer has a low
clutch, I think they are set up differently (springs,weights, ect.)
Im not sure but they may have different sprockets. Thats just a maybe though.
I'm not really sure about all these but thats just some stuff I've heard.
heavier, with the racks and excess fenders
transmision, I don't know technically what but I know the explorer has a low
clutch, I think they are set up differently (springs,weights, ect.)
Im not sure but they may have different sprockets. Thats just a maybe though.
I'm not really sure about all these but thats just some stuff I've heard.
#3
Here's a few reasons I know of:
1. Explorer is about 100 lbs heavier.
2. Clutching in the Explorer is different(springs, weights, helix(?))
3. Explorer has 25 inch tires while Scrambler has 22 & 23 inch tires.
4. Scrambler supposedly has a "factory tuned" pipe, and different porting.
5. Scrambler is geared slightly higher since it has smaller tires and less weight
6. if it makes any difference, Scrambler is more aerodynamic.
7. the name Scrambler sounds WAY faster than Explorer
1. Explorer is about 100 lbs heavier.
2. Clutching in the Explorer is different(springs, weights, helix(?))
3. Explorer has 25 inch tires while Scrambler has 22 & 23 inch tires.
4. Scrambler supposedly has a "factory tuned" pipe, and different porting.
5. Scrambler is geared slightly higher since it has smaller tires and less weight
6. if it makes any difference, Scrambler is more aerodynamic.
7. the name Scrambler sounds WAY faster than Explorer
#5
#6
#7
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)