View Poll Results: Maxxis Zillas or Interco Swamp Lites
Maxxis Zillas
1
25.00%
Interco Swamp Lites
3
75.00%
Voters: 4. You may not vote on this poll
Maxxix Zillas or Interco Swamp Lites?
#1
Maxxix Zillas or Interco Swamp Lites?
Hello all, I'm torn between these two tires. I'm going to go up a size to 27" and get 2-27x9x12 and 2-27-11x12. We ride every kind of terrain up here with the exception of large sandy areas like dunes. We do have some sand but I've never had a problem in it. We encounter mud, water, roots, rocks, hard pack, tarred streets used as connectors, snow, and ice. Snow is usually on a groomed trail. What do you think?
#3
I don't know much about either tire but one guy I sometimes ride with has Swamp Lites and was talking about getting a less aggressive tire. We ride mostly on dirt with some pavement to get to the trails. He wanted something he could slide around corners instead of having them digging in so much. If you want something that really digs in they would be a good choice. I'd probably try the Zillas.
#4
These tires are very different. The Zilla is a lightweight mud tire and will probably be superior in low traction situations like mud and snow but they will ride rougher than the swamp lights and wear a lot faster. One of the glowing attributes of the SL's is how long they last. Zilla's on the other hand are made from a lighter and softer compound. I'm not sure they would last long on hard packed roads and trails as an everyday tire, especially with a rotax twin lighting them up.
With that said, I desperately need a mud/snow tire for the renegade and I think I may go with the zilla's. They perform well and won't rob any power away but I'll definetly be sticking with the stock atrs for everyday trail riding.
With that said, I desperately need a mud/snow tire for the renegade and I think I may go with the zilla's. They perform well and won't rob any power away but I'll definetly be sticking with the stock atrs for everyday trail riding.
#5
This is a switch, you're usually the one giving advice not asking, Moose. I like the fact that the Zillas are basically the lightest 6 ply mud tires you can buy. There has to be some compromise made to make them that light though and I can assume you won't get as many miles out of them as tires with a heavier, harder rubber compound. I think they would perform well, just might not last as long as the Swamplites. Even in a 27" size, they probably weigh about the same or less than many other 25" mud tires and obviously quite a bit less than the swamplites. That probably won't matter that much with the powerful Can-Am v-twin but it would with a quad with less power. Still might make a noticeable difference though. I will take a serious look at the Zillas myself when I decide to get tires for my Grizzly. I'll probably stay at stock 25" size myself or perhaps maybe go to a 26" Zilla.
#6
These tires are very different. The Zilla is a lightweight mud tire and will probably be superior in low traction situations like mud and snow but they will ride rougher than the swamp lights and wear a lot faster. One of the glowing attributes of the SL's is how long they last. Zilla's on the other hand are made from a lighter and softer compound. I'm not sure they would last long on hard packed roads and trails as an everyday tire, especially with a rotax twin lighting them up.
With that said, I desperately need a mud/snow tire for the renegade and I think I may go with the zilla's. They perform well and won't rob any power away but I'll definetly be sticking with the stock atrs for everyday trail riding.
With that said, I desperately need a mud/snow tire for the renegade and I think I may go with the zilla's. They perform well and won't rob any power away but I'll definetly be sticking with the stock atrs for everyday trail riding.
#7
This is a switch, you're usually the one giving advice not asking, Moose. I like the fact that the Zillas are basically the lightest 6 ply mud tires you can buy. There has to be some compromise made to make them that light though and I can assume you won't get as many miles out of them as tires with a heavier, harder rubber compound. I think they would perform well, just might not last as long as the Swamplites. Even in a 27" size, they probably weigh about the same or less than many other 25" mud tires and obviously quite a bit less than the swamplites. That probably won't matter that much with the powerful Can-Am v-twin but it would with a quad with less power. Still might make a noticeable difference though. I will take a serious look at the Zillas myself when I decide to get tires for my Grizzly. I'll probably stay at stock 25" size myself or perhaps maybe go to a 26" Zilla.
Trending Topics
#8
#9
They do fair in snow. Just not as good as a tire with a lot of *****. More biting edges with ***** than a mud tire with bars that push the slop off to the side like the Zillas probably do and like the XTR's I had did. I'm on a tighter budget these days so these two were more or less what I can afford. I'm leaning towards the Swamplites.
#10
Swamp Lites look like they'd take forever to wear out but I'd like to know which tire does the best in snow. I thought mud tires with wide spaced lugs were supposed to do better. Zillas should do pretty good in mud and I thought they'd be good for snow too. I don't ride in snow or mud anymore so I think the Swamp Lites would be a lot better choice for me. I still can't decide which way to vote for your terrain that includes mud and snow.