yamaha blaster vs honda 400ex
#21
10-10-2005, 09:35 PM
yamaha blaster vs honda 400ex
Fact is the blaster is outdated 1970's technology thats fun for the entry level teen rider. They are a great cheap little machine for a kid to learn on but a complete waste of money to mod. you could have $10k into one and still not hang with a yfz or a trx on the track, 5k and barely able to keep up with a 400ex. kids save your money and buy something half fast to start with,
#22
10-10-2005, 09:55 PM
yamaha blaster vs honda 400ex
Originally posted by: noballs
Fact is the blaster is outdated 1970's technology thats fun for the entry level teen rider. They are a great cheap little machine for a kid to learn on but a complete waste of money to mod. you could have $10k into one and still not hang with a yfz or a trx on the track, 5k and barely able to keep up with a 400ex. kids save your money and buy something half fast to start with,
Fact is the blaster is outdated 1970's technology thats fun for the entry level teen rider. They are a great cheap little machine for a kid to learn on but a complete waste of money to mod. you could have $10k into one and still not hang with a yfz or a trx on the track, 5k and barely able to keep up with a 400ex. kids save your money and buy something half fast to start with,
#23
10-11-2005, 12:19 AM
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#24
10-11-2005, 02:38 AM
#26
10-11-2005, 09:41 PM
#28
10-12-2005, 02:42 PM
yamaha blaster vs honda 400ex
Anyone that regularly rides in the sand would have been able to call this race.
There was two factors that really mattered worth a crap in this one.
1: weight
2: and much more importantly, PADDLES.
Even if the 400EX rider was equal weight, the blaster would have still probably won.
Its simple... paddles launch the quad out of the hole, knobbies sink and spin in the sand.
Not knocking the blaster or anything, but if that 400 had paddles, the outcome would have been different...
(ive owned no less than 2 400EX's, modded one to a 440, and glamis was my only place)
There was two factors that really mattered worth a crap in this one.
1: weight
2: and much more importantly, PADDLES.
Even if the 400EX rider was equal weight, the blaster would have still probably won.
Its simple... paddles launch the quad out of the hole, knobbies sink and spin in the sand.
Not knocking the blaster or anything, but if that 400 had paddles, the outcome would have been different...
(ive owned no less than 2 400EX's, modded one to a 440, and glamis was my only place)
#29
03-08-2008, 12:38 AM
yamaha blaster vs honda 400ex
i beg to differ i own a 91 blaster
.90 over...wisco super stock piston trinity port job/milled head delta 3 reeds/reed spacer scarey fast power now valve...k/n filter kit fmf sst full exhaust...srp modified crank shaft and white brothers clutch kit and its mostly all top end its all in how its build to run i recently owned a camed out 300 ex and a 350 worrior .50 over with a white brothers high lift also and i'd say my blasters right there with the 2 on the top end...well not so much my ex more bottom then anything but point being most of the time its not nice to dis the moddle of bike but the modifications because i know i can bust a 400's ***
.90 over...wisco super stock piston trinity port job/milled head delta 3 reeds/reed spacer scarey fast power now valve...k/n filter kit fmf sst full exhaust...srp modified crank shaft and white brothers clutch kit and its mostly all top end its all in how its build to run i recently owned a camed out 300 ex and a 350 worrior .50 over with a white brothers high lift also and i'd say my blasters right there with the 2 on the top end...well not so much my ex more bottom then anything but point being most of the time its not nice to dis the moddle of bike but the modifications because i know i can bust a 400's ***
