Anyone that has this model that would like to comment on pluses and minuses of ownership, it would be appreciated. Also, if you could post what you paid, it would help me get a base for the dealership negotiations. I am wondering what the extra 30cc for the King-Quad is going to benefit if any. I like the trade off in the smaller size and weight for the smaller engine. Has anyone not been satisfied in the power for POWER, not speed. I am more than satisfied to run 35 mph down the trails. What if any difference does the twin dome combustion chamber engine make. Any comments or insight would be appreciated.

Thank You,

 

They are slow, outdated, and have crappy suspension. They are reliable and are true workhorses. The indep. rear suspension is nice, but travel is soooo limited that the indep. susp. is not practical. The triple range tranny is overkill. Unless you are using this for pure work-only chores, don't get it. Its over-priced for a 250cc, especially for one with a 10+ year old design. The King Quad is old too, and the extra 30cc makes no difference-its offset by the weight increase.
Later,shawn