which one is faster in top mid and bottom and which one do you think is better

 

the grizzly is better in the motor dept but the rincon is a better handler.

 

grizz is faster, not as good as rincon in handling, grizz has diff lock, more ground clearance and is more capable grizz is a better buy

where in NY are you?

 

I had a Grizzly, and had lots of Problems. It was not even abused. I got rid of it for a Rubicon. But out of the two I would take the Rincon any day. You can always do a few simple mods to wake the motor up.

 

All yamahas are that way. I have a friend that has 25 zillas on a wolverine and it is always messed up, nothing the tires would do. it might b a yamha thing. i would really get the RINCON over the too, the hondas never give trouble.

 

I would not say they are ALL that way.I only put 3 k miles on my 00 Kodiak and it was SOLID!We have three grizzs in our group and they are abused and hold up fine.All have oversize tires and see every mud hole.The Rinny would be nice not having a belt and they do handle much better.
02 650 Camo

 

hey, ProRacerIwish, ur posting this in the honda forum, haha.... i dont think ur gunna get any good replies on the grizz on the honda forum. lol

 

Grizzly hands down the better quad. Stronger all around and in my opinion handles plenty well.

 

I owned the 2003 Rincon for 2 years and except for a little better ride,the Rincon does NOTHING better than the Grizz. The Grizz has a front locker,disk brakes that are far better than drum brakes if you are going to play in the mud/water,adjustable suspension,a low range,and FAR better downhill engine braking.

I currently own a new 700cc EFI Suzuki King Quad,and I like it much more than the Rincon in every department.