1. This is the ACT "semi-independent" machine with a solid rear axle, right?
2. Is it full time 4WD?
3. Speedo and Odometer optional?
4. Still has heel-toe shifter?

Sorry for the bother, but the specs on the web site are a little vague and there are no pics for the VP. I've been thinking about downsizing from my Sportsman 600 and the VP seems to have all the right stuff for ranch chores. Also considering the Suzuki Eiger, but the Cat has rear disc and a bit more suspension, plus the heel-toe, (I think), for big boot shifting.

Thanks for any input.

 

1. Yes

2. Yes

3. Yes

4. Yes

If it was me I'd get the 400 IRS (I did actually). More ground clearance.

 

thanks! I know the IRS offers more ground clearance but it also has 4 rubber CV boots and 4 CV joints and many other additional pivoting parts compared to the SRA. in addition to downsizing I am also avoiding future maintenance issues, hence the move from liquid to air/oil cooled. I want a machine that I will rarely have to touch aside from turning the key and riding. fuel savings is also part of the equation, for my sp600 sucks up one gallon of "liquid gold" every 6 or 7 miles.

anyone have any comments on the full-time 4WD, steering effort?

 

I have over 1200 miles and 1400 hours on my 400 IRS with no boot or joint problem. The 2005 and up 400s run the same CV joints and axles as the 650, so I will doubt you can abuse them with the 400. I have ridden the VP and the steering effort is noticably more than the my 400 in 2X4 mode and about the same when in 4X4. My 400 is getting 15 to 20 mpg (which sucks compared to my 250).