Will my new stock blaster beat a stock warrior? The race would be on hard dirt.

 

top end or accel? but they would would pretty much the same i think and the warrior might have a few more mph on the top end

 

stock for stock. blaster in a short race, and warrior in a long race.

 

i would think take your blaster and plat some place else

 

In acceleration it'll be a damn close race as far as the machines go, it'll come down to whoever knows their machine better and can get a good launch and hit the shift points. On top end there's no doubt that the warrior will take it.

 

if rder skill is equal, erm and you both have those big balloon tyres which yamaha insists on prooviding you with, im going to say the warrior will will. i just think the torque is going to give the warrior a better start, however you you be far behind him. when you top out though, your going to lose as i believe warriors have a few more MPH, so hes guna walk away there. sorry mate

 

from past experience, stock for stock the warrior is ahead by a quad length until 4th gear when it starts to climb about 8mph faster then it top speed. warrior=64mph blaster=56

 

Dunno if it is just ours but my 2001 Blaster with 9 teeth on the front sproket beat my bros 2004 warrior both off the line, and flat out I could just nudge further forward although i would not like to of done it for more then 5 seconds as i think I would of ended up with a pile of engine in the middle of the road, or 2 big black lines down the road when the thing heat ceases and locks up. I also find the Blaster to be a little easier to ride (has the chuck-a-bility factor been so light) so i think on a hard dirt track the baster would get it, but if it involved big long straights and high end stuff I'd rather be on a Warrior.

 

lol i can GUARENTEE a warrior isn't pushing 64 stock....
maybe 60ISH... 62 with a tail wind...

 

stock blaster vs. stock warrior, naaa