Yamaha Discussions about Yamaha ATVs.

Whats better yamaha warrior or Suzuki quadsport.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 13, 2012 | 07:26 PM
  #1  
StrafeXe's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Weekend Warrior
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Default Whats better yamaha warrior or Suzuki quadsport.

The warrior is a 87 and the quadsport is a 86. i can get both for 1200$ What should i get???
 
Reply
Old May 14, 2012 | 11:04 AM
  #2  
Raptor450's Avatar
Pro Rider
I ride, because football, basketball, and baseball only uses one ball!
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,407
Likes: 0
Default

$1200 for either one is a lot of money. Unless that Warrior is in mint condition, I would stay away from it, and really I would stay away from ANY of the '87-'89 Warriors, and I'm not a fan of anything Suzuki.
 
Reply
Old May 14, 2012 | 02:38 PM
  #3  
Scooter86's Avatar
Extreme Pro Rider
Knows Old ATV Questions!
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,127
Likes: 3
Default

$1200.00 would be on the high end for either one unless it was minty fresh. I am not sure why Raptor450 is against '87-89 Warriors. They were essentially unchanged from the initial offering other than some minor cosmetic changes(light placement.) Even the Raptor 350 is predominately a Warrior at heart with new plastic.

My preference would be towards the Warrior. They are more powerful/faster, have electric start, and have sold a ton more units. Parts are only going to get harder and harder to find for the Qsport, while much of the Warrior mechanicals are still being made by the oem and aftermarket.
 
Reply
Old May 14, 2012 | 08:13 PM
  #4  
Raptor450's Avatar
Pro Rider
I ride, because football, basketball, and baseball only uses one ball!
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,407
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Scooter86
I am not sure why Raptor450 is against '87-89 Warriors. They were essentially unchanged from the initial offering other than some minor cosmetic changes(light placement.)
Mainly the front a-arms are different than the '90-up Warriors, and every Warrior I've ever seen (or had) needed the front ball joints replaced. It's much easier to find used (or new) a-arms for the '90-up Warriors because they were unchanged even on the Raptor 350's. Plus the swingarm bearing carrier and chain adjustment design on the '87-89 was a poor design. But I imagine a "90-up swingram would bolt right up to the '87 chassis. Not to mention any other used parts (fenders, lights, etc) that would be easier to find that were basically unchanged all the way up to 2004 that will not bolt directly to the '87-89.

Not sure how the prices are in your area, but here in NC I see Raptor 350's for $1400 - 1800 all the time. Here's a good example: ***price reduced***2004 raptor 350 se. The Raptor 350 is the same as a Warrior with a few updates and Raptor-style plastics.
 
Reply
Old May 17, 2012 | 11:55 AM
  #5  
Nelson's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Default

warrior for sure
 
Reply
Old May 17, 2012 | 02:24 PM
  #6  
beastlywarrior228's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Default

Warrior by far actually the 87 had replacable ball joints so that solves that issue
 
Reply
Old May 25, 2012 | 11:08 PM
  #7  
sportszillasheex's Avatar
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 621
Likes: 0
Default

the engine was moved back in the frame in the early 90's too. unless you are a big guy id suggest looking at 300ex's too
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Reactant
General Chat
15
Mar 30, 2022 02:08 AM
STLyamwar
Classifieds, Garage Sale & Swap Shop
1
Jul 25, 2020 04:44 AM
manuelrivera
Yamaha
2
Aug 8, 2015 04:34 PM
suzukiquadrunner1987
Yamaha
0
Aug 6, 2015 05:29 PM
Ashley S
Yamaha
5
Jul 31, 2015 09:46 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:09 AM.