Whats better a 400 EX or the 350 Warrior?
#1
Hey guys I am thinking of getting a new quad and I am curious which of these quads is the better trail machine? I am leaning towards the Warrior do to no reverse on the Honda. How does the power compare between the Warrior and the 400EX?
I haven't ridden one in about 6 years, since I sold my Suzuki 250. Thanks in advance...
I haven't ridden one in about 6 years, since I sold my Suzuki 250. Thanks in advance...
#2
i would recamend the 400ex! no question! i had a warrior and did not like it. the 400ex has lots of room to grow.i feel that the warrior is a tank do to the weight of it. one minor set back on the 400ex is the reverse but it is worth it. the 400ex is an awesome bike!!!!!!!
#6
I just bought a 400ex and my buddie who rides with me 90% of the time I ride has a warior with a k&n air filter and a 14 toothe front sproket for winter riding and our top end is identical but I beat him there. In my opinion the honda suspention and whole chasise layout is much better. His seat is a little softer. Not having reverse is no big deal. The machine is light enough that you can either push it back or just pick-up the front and swing it around.
#7
I prefer the Warrior. I've got my reasons. Reasons, good enough that I bought a Warrior instead of the 400ex.
Trending Topics
#8
I also bought a Warrior because of it's history. There are alot of valid points on this thread though. I guess one could say the Warrior is sporty and the Ex is sportier. Depends on your style. See also the Yamaha postings.


