Whats the top speed on these stock quads?
#1
ON these quads::
Yamaha Warrior
Yamaha Blaster
Honda 400ex
Honda 300ex
Kawasaki Mojave
Kawasaki Lakota
Whats the top speed on all these quads in stock form? , Im going to get a ALBA WARRIOR pretty soon and wanted to know if i should!! [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-cool.gif[/img]
Yamaha Warrior
Yamaha Blaster
Honda 400ex
Honda 300ex
Kawasaki Mojave
Kawasaki Lakota
Whats the top speed on all these quads in stock form? , Im going to get a ALBA WARRIOR pretty soon and wanted to know if i should!! [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-cool.gif[/img]
#3
oh yeah sorry i didn't post this in my last one but the blaster will out run the 300ex at least my blaster did. although i weigh about 125 and the blaster weighs 320 dry weight and the guy on the 300ex weighed about 180 and the 300ex weighs 377 dry weight. so i guess i did have an advantage.
#4
My frind has a stock 2000 blaster and he beat a piped and jetted 300ex!!! No kidding, I was there to see it and I was amazed. I didn't think he had a chance. They raced 4 times and all were very very close. I would say that the warrior would beat them both. If you want one of those quads for going fast, I would say 400ex the warrior, blaster, then the rest tie for last.
#5
well i would get a 400 EX if ALBA had one but they dont. Alba is selling moddifeied Warriors, Raptors, Banshees, DS650's, etc. ALL FOR STOCK PRICE!!! . but no 400 EX, so once i find a buyer for my Polaris Xpedition, I will buy a Alba Warrior. its got there pipe kit, graphics, jetting, and sum other engine mods. pretty sweet deal!!.
so i guess a stock warrior comparewd to al these other stocks quads would win except for the 400ex right?. sounds good. maybe the modified warrior would beat the stock 400 ex?? yalll think ?
so i guess a stock warrior comparewd to al these other stocks quads would win except for the 400ex right?. sounds good. maybe the modified warrior would beat the stock 400 ex?? yalll think ?
#7
blaster 55mph
warrior 63mph
300ex 54mph
400ex 69mph
mojave 54mph
THe warrior can wheelie but you have to work for it. Either honda will wheelie better.
warrior 63mph
300ex 54mph
400ex 69mph
mojave 54mph
THe warrior can wheelie but you have to work for it. Either honda will wheelie better.
Trending Topics
#8
when you say you have to work for the wheelie, do you mean like you cant just put it in first or second gear and just hit the throttle and the front end will pop up or like you have to pop the clutch to get the front up? . and how is the jumping? smooth in the air and smooth landing ?
#9
in first or second in wheelies easily but it is geared so low it reves to the moon right away. It will wheelie in third but you will have to stand up and pull on the bars to do it. I also had a 14 tooth on to gear it up because it has so much bottom end. You will love the warrior, they are reliable, good on fuel, alsome in deep water and can beat all the older sport quads.
#10
400ex
warrior
mojave
blaster
300ex
Warriors- aren't sporty at all , they feel more like a utility machine then anything.(don't buy one)
400exs- good , sporty awesome suspention , kind of gutless though.
Mojave- the motor sounds good on paper ... very short machine, handles tight coners pretty well.
Blaster - Cheaply designed , tough , lots of mods available , very good motor for 200cc , but way too small.
300ex - TERRIBLE front shocks , good brakes , the motor isn't too bad for what it is , but it is pretty de-tuned, the bike has lots of potential though.
I own one and personally i would never buy another one if my life depended on it , but then again thats just me.
You can't say a machines exact top speed becaue there are too many veriables when deciding a machines top speed.
If i were you i would spend the extra money and get a 400ex , the warrior isn't sporty at all , i drove a few and i would take my 300ex over one any day (and thats sad).
But really its up to you what you buy , thats just my point of view.
warrior
mojave
blaster
300ex
Warriors- aren't sporty at all , they feel more like a utility machine then anything.(don't buy one)
400exs- good , sporty awesome suspention , kind of gutless though.
Mojave- the motor sounds good on paper ... very short machine, handles tight coners pretty well.
Blaster - Cheaply designed , tough , lots of mods available , very good motor for 200cc , but way too small.
300ex - TERRIBLE front shocks , good brakes , the motor isn't too bad for what it is , but it is pretty de-tuned, the bike has lots of potential though.
I own one and personally i would never buy another one if my life depended on it , but then again thats just me.
You can't say a machines exact top speed becaue there are too many veriables when deciding a machines top speed.
If i were you i would spend the extra money and get a 400ex , the warrior isn't sporty at all , i drove a few and i would take my 300ex over one any day (and thats sad).
But really its up to you what you buy , thats just my point of view.


