buying a 250
#2
I'd choose between the Recon and Ozark. Just look them over and take them for a ride if possible. The Recon's retail price is a little cheaper for 2004. The Recon ES is priced the same as the Ozark while the foot shift Recon is a couple hundred less. Either machine would probably serve her well.
#6
The Beartracker is no more primitive than the Recon. The simpler they are the more reliable they are. [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif[/img]. Whatever floats your boat I guess, but the Beartracker was great for me.
#7
The Timberwolf (Beartracker) came out in 1992 while the Recon came out in 1997. I'm sure the Beartracker does an alright job but it is more on the utility side. If someone wants something for work then the Beartracker does have better rack and tow ratings. But it is a little more primitive in it's arrangement of things like the choke and reverse switch placement. It also only has single a-arms in the front compared to double a-arms of the Recon and Ozark. The overall finished look of the Beartracker isn't as nice as some of the others.
Even though I liked my Recon, I'd look close at the Ozark.
Even though I liked my Recon, I'd look close at the Ozark.
Trending Topics
#8
Alright, I agree with you somewhat. The reverse could be in a better place, but it is a better worker. It's true that it doesn't look as good to some people, but the Ozark and Recon have wimpy bumpers compared to the Tracker. And actually the Yamaha has MacPherson struts up front, not single A-arms, the Bayou is the one with single A-arms.


