I ride in mud deep mud any one had any experience with both

 

All I have to say is get a rancher or foreman

 

I don't know if you have considered a Arctic Cat, Bombardier or Polaris, but either of these three would be better in the mud in my opinion. Due to a better designed front differential, they give you true 4-wheel drive or as close as you can get. Also on the A/C and Pol (not sure on Bomb) you will get more ground clearance, which is a big help.Just my cent worth.

 

Be careful if you get a Polaris. I have seen way to many Polaris get stranded because their belt started slipping. Honda is chain driven and can always be lifted. Ride RED

 

just got a 2002 350 4x4 rancher w/50" plow and set of chains ............5200 otd its a real nice bike and has plenty of power to do the things you need to do....and its still small enough to manage threw trails the big bikes won't fit[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-happy.gif[/img]

 

Go with the Big Bear. Selectable 2WD/4WD is an excellent feature.

 

TBALL,
THE 4X4 HONDA IS SHAFT DRIVE. I HAD A 2000 KODIAK ,GLAD IT'S GONE. REV. LIMITER FOR REVERSE , NO THANKS, DISC REARS RUNNING IN MUD, AGAIN NO THANKS 2 SETS PADS 500 MILES. TOO HIGH AND TIPPY. PUSH BUTTON 4X4 ALWAYS STUCK, BELT HOUSING LEAKED ,QUAD WAS BOUGHT NEW. NOW HAVE 01' RANCHER ,SHOULD HAVE STUCK WITH HONDA TOO START WITH,BUT EVERY FUPPS DUCK FROM TIME TO TIME..... NOT SHOUTING JUST LIKE CAP'S