should i go with the 400ex or the warrior. i like both a lot and they both seem about the same quality, but i am undecided. i would love to have a 250r or zilla if it was new, but i am not to crazy about used things.

 

The 400EX is only $600.00 more than a Warrior and you would spend 3 times that to get 400EX performance from the Warrior......Go with the 400EX.

If you think you need a reverse, don't forget about the Z400. It has more power than the EX and has a reverse gear.......for the same price.

 

Don't even consider the Warrior!! I owned one for years, and was never so happy as I was on the day I sold it and got the 400EX!!! It is a heavy and clunkey outdated design.

 

Don't compare the 2, compare the warrior o the 300ex not the 400ex. Go with the 400ex and as whoever said if you want reverse, liquid cooling more power go for a z400 or the kfx

 

http://forums.atvconnection.com/mess...hreadid=316521


Imagine that!!![img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif[/img][img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-confused.gif[/img]

 

Its like asking last forever and great handling or loud two stroke that will not last as long and runs terrible.

 

OOPS!!!!

They are both 4 strokes, wheelinforlife.

You gotta hate that!![img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-blush.gif[/img]

 

IF you were considering a 250R and Zilla, then your not worried about reverse. Go with the EX it handles better and has lots more power than the Warrior. \\

And you will spend alot more than $600 to get the Warrior as fast as the EX. like knowsalot stated.

 

If your going to buy the EX new, you might as well get a Z or KFX.

But I say get the 400 EX used. It will be alot cheaper.

 

go with the 400ex, more reilable