thanks ron, that makes my loss seem better i thought they said it was only a 720. but i was doing some racing of my own when that took place. so i reckon i will take my spanking first[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/img] hehehehehe hey nut im just about done shaking them[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif[/img]

 

I guess that means we are gonna get the pleasure of seeing you on here more often than huh? Come on over to Winnemucca the weekend before Halloween and I will make sure you get that whoopin.[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif[/img]

 

[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-blush.gif[/img] That is unwanted attention right there![img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-happy.gif[/img]

 

i guess i will just have to get another spanking from cynick[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/img]

 

I think you would like it Scott.

 

Good job guys. We now have our first records up. Anybody else shooting to put numbers up in another class?

 

HRT is shooting to run some 4.1's on a stock chassis.....with a 650cc powerplant. [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif[/img]

 

these lightened chassis are getting so light with so much horse power, that they are getting out of control and dont want to hook up, at what point do you have to start adding a little weight back on to get the hook up that one is trying to get. or am i trying to overanalize this whole thing. lighter rider lighter bike paddles but it gets to a point where there is to much power for the proper hook up. where if you had a little heavier combo instead of breaking loose the tires maybe it would hook up better. where is the fine line at.

 

Less weight+less swingarm+more hookup=going faster.

 

rite now you guys cant keep these bikes from blowing the tires off the bike, lighter weight shorter swingarm more hook up also equals more whealies.