Honda Discussions about Honda ATVs.

>>><<<

Old Sep 11, 2003 | 12:40 AM
  #1  
CrAcKhEaD's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Pro Rider
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
Default >>><<<

I like the looks of the new TRX but would still have been happier if they made it look like the 88R just alittle more agressive, what do u guys think?
 
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2003 | 12:45 AM
  #2  
1986SuZuKiQuAdRaCeR's Avatar
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 649
Likes: 0
Default >>><<<

forsure, man.


oh well, 400EX plastic should go right on and fullbore makes some great stuff for them.
 
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2003 | 12:46 AM
  #3  
moto4DX's Avatar
Range Rover
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Default >>><<<

the 450 R has to be one of the ugliest quads since cannondale. I am not hating on Honda. I like them but it is ugly.
 
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2003 | 12:48 AM
  #4  
CrAcKhEaD's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Pro Rider
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
Default >>><<<

dont get me wrong i think it looks badas$, i like the CBR light concept but i still prefer the R looks.
 
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2003 | 12:52 AM
  #5  
twentycharacters's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,387
Likes: 0
Default >>><<<

the new R looks great but I too think that the 88 R was arguably the best looking bike ever!

anyone can say what they want about laziness or whatever but when youve ridden your @ss off all day its kinda nice to have electric start. i thought they would have put electric start on it even though its not necessary - just a little touch that every one else from cannondale to yamaha was/is doing...
oh well it wont stop me from getting one, though.

let the showdowns begin btwn the 450R and the YFZ!
 
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2003 | 12:53 AM
  #6  
Raptoryfn660r's Avatar
RIP Dear Friend
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 22,930
Likes: 0
Default >>><<<

Originally posted by: CrAcKhEaD
I like the looks of the new TRX but would still have been happier if they made it look like the 88R just alittle more agressive, what do u guys think?
Nobody is going to be looking at the front very long anyways, its the rear that I will be looking at.

ChetRacer[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-cool.gif[/img]
 
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2003 | 12:55 AM
  #7  
Kracker's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Default >>><<<

Did you just say you are slow?
 
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2003 | 12:56 AM
  #8  
CrAcKhEaD's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Pro Rider
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
Default >>><<<

compared to the 450R
 
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2003 | 01:09 AM
  #9  
twentycharacters's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,387
Likes: 0
Default >>><<<

It's nice to have if you accidently stall in the middle of a race too!!!! Especially in MX where it happens alot. I think that will make alot of buyers go yamaha.
totally agree, Ridley.

just wondering -is your yfz450 holding up good? no problems?
 
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2003 | 02:14 AM
  #10  
RoughRider01's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
Default >>><<<

I agree with you Ridley. Not all the time will it start on the first or second kick if it did stall. There are pros and cons for both of the YFZ and the new TRX starting procedures. For reliability reasons i would chose a kick starter tho. I think the kick starter would hold up to greater abuse. For example GNCC, there is alot of water; water could get into the electrical or battery failure if it isnt sealed up properly. Sure, electric start would be quicker and easier but what would you have to fall back onto if that failed. I personally would like to see both electric and kick start on a race quad. I think selector said when he took of his electric start it only saved him like 10 lbs. From what ive heard it isnt to hard to kick over the crf450 engine. I guess time will only tell which will perform better. What do you guys think??

RoughRider01
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:34 AM.