im trying to look for the best bang for my buck. what should i choose and which one is better for different things. mud, jump, trails, hills, aftermarket parts, ex. Anything will help

 

I don't think either is much good for mud, though both can be quite a lot of fun ...

Trails ... tossup there, for fast trails I'd say the 300EX. It's more agile

Jumps: 300EX, has a better suspension setup. If you' re not doing big jumps, the warrior can do nice ones, but the suspension bottoms out real easy, even just on the takeoff ramp (see pics on my page).

Hill Climbs: Warrior all the way. More torque, and the heavier front end makes the Warrior an excellent hill climber. Not to say you're going to hang with Raptors and such up big hills, but you'll be more stable for sure.

After market .. probably about the same

Hope that helps ya! Oh .. the Warrior's reverse is much easier to use .. if that's important to you.

 

NL u must b drinkin the bong water again....
mud-300ex cuz it can wheelie outta it [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-tongue.gif[/img]
Jump warrior the front shocks on the 300ex "BLOW out " and need to FREQUENTLY be replaced
trails-warrior warrior owns trails
hills-warrior warrior owns hills
aftermarket parts-BOTH u can get parts for both not sure that there's alot for the 300ex..

 

they r both simalar! The warrior will have more top speed, but the 300 will have better exeleration!

they r both great bikes!!!!!![img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/img]
the question is if u want HONDA or YAMAHA

 

warrior is to heavy 300ex accerelration is better but top end goes to the warrior.300ex is much better in the trails (my buddy has one).300ex is easier to wheelie in mud the both are terrible. either way they are both good

 

rode both frequently in the past 3 months and would have to say the 300
300
mud...300 can go through 2-4 ft much easier with the low end acceleration
jumps...the 300 ex rarely bottoms out unless u land on the two fronts...
trails...300ex handeling is amazing...quick and agile...
hills...front is not as heavy but easily forgotten with practice of leaning forward...
aftermarket parts...havent had a problem with gettin anything aftermarket yet...
warrior
mud...front heavy sinks more so not as easy to get out of it...
jumps...feels like its lugging forward with so much front weight...
trails...for fast trails its alright steering is stiffer than 300 though...
hills...better b/c of more front weight but less accleration for quick hills...
aftermarket parts...havent ahd any probs with gettin anyhting aftermarket yet...

overall----300 with reliability as a FACTOR...for every time the 300 broke the warrior broke 3 times....

 

cool,but dont the warrior have more top speed than the 300eby a couple mph.personally i dont care i like the acceleration to get to top speed rather than the actual top speed

 

Ive rode both and it seems that the warrior is great for mud and hills and is somewhat nose heavy wheras the honda does better on tight trails and jumps or MX tracks. both are good allaround and very reliable bikes...
the 2 are close in speed but the warrior has 6 gears and the 300ex has 5 and the warrior is faster... well i hope that helps they are both very fun machines.

Well enjoy

 

id go with the 300 it is great in mud and u can get the front end up easily- i hit jumps and unless u land wrong the suspensoin is great.
I have a question about mine- its a 2000 all stock xcpt an air filter. i read a review that a stock 2000 is supposed to go 52 Mine only goes 40-45
ne suggestions on whats wrong- its been rolled twice within 20 minutes of wach other, but honda is reliable- is this the problem or something else
Thanks

 

probably lean because of air filter does it run hotter