Worst Sport Atv On the market.
Mar 14, 2002 | 05:26 PM
#41
Thread Starter
|
Pro Rider
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Ouch that hurt my feelings haha and i told you guys i aint nuttin but sum dumb hick frum tennnesse. Oh yes and sorry teacher for not using my punctuation marks,please forgive me im illiterate hehe. The 300ex is a peice of sh*t and doesnt have much horsepower but it goes over 50 does you lawn mower do that? The 300EX may be a peice of sh*t thoughbut you dont see me cryin like you two. You two have way to much time on your hands i suggest maybe gettin another job.OK well enough of that lets get back to the subject the polaris models have bad handeling which makes them poor contenders. Sorry guys will you be my freind??
Mar 14, 2002 | 05:49 PM
#43
Trailblazer
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
I would like to get back to the subject of the 300EX being the WORST SPORT QUAD, see that SPORT QUAD? how does the scrambler beat a 300EX when it comes to sportiness. I own a 250X which is essentially the same, I would have to disagree on this, its your opinion, but there are much worse sport quads out there.
What about the Mojave? Thats no better or any faster than the 300EX, is it? I honestly havent ridden one. Ive seen one get crushed in a race by a 300EX which doesnt count for much. What about the Lakota, that thing is even worse than the mojave. The warrior is an equal to the 300EX, no better, no worse, except when it comes to the engine. Those of you who think the ~50cc increase in engine size means anything, think again, its a little thing called 2 valves that makes the warrior worthless. Where i race ive never seen a warrior, even a hopped up one come close to the front of the pack. So in my opinion the warrior or blaster along with any of Polaris's so called "sport models" would have to be the worst on the market today.
One more thing, reverse procedure on the 300EX? I see nothing wrong with it, if you keep the quad on the trail or track there is no reason to have a problem with it. How does that affect its overall sportiness? I think not. Well im done spouting, this is my opinion i just had to address a few points. Thanks for listening and accepting this. Peace out.
What about the Mojave? Thats no better or any faster than the 300EX, is it? I honestly havent ridden one. Ive seen one get crushed in a race by a 300EX which doesnt count for much. What about the Lakota, that thing is even worse than the mojave. The warrior is an equal to the 300EX, no better, no worse, except when it comes to the engine. Those of you who think the ~50cc increase in engine size means anything, think again, its a little thing called 2 valves that makes the warrior worthless. Where i race ive never seen a warrior, even a hopped up one come close to the front of the pack. So in my opinion the warrior or blaster along with any of Polaris's so called "sport models" would have to be the worst on the market today.
One more thing, reverse procedure on the 300EX? I see nothing wrong with it, if you keep the quad on the trail or track there is no reason to have a problem with it. How does that affect its overall sportiness? I think not. Well im done spouting, this is my opinion i just had to address a few points. Thanks for listening and accepting this. Peace out.
Mar 14, 2002 | 06:21 PM
#46
Pro Rider
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 0
Ok here goes, 50cc makes a boatload of difference, a 450EX can beat a raptor 660 but in stock form the 400EX will get it's @$$ handed to it (im talkign drag racing). You take any quad out there and you add 50cc and you will notice a massive difference. Ever seen how fast a 300cc 250R will go?
Mar 14, 2002 | 06:37 PM
#47
Pro Rider
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,629
Likes: 0
My theory on the extra 50cc is this;
In a smaller bore engine, such as the Mojave, 300EX, or warrior, 50cc isn't going to make all that much difference, if it's just 50 more cc's, not more agressinve cams or DOHC V.S. SOHC or other vital components .
In larger bore motor's, it can make a difference somewhat, but not all that much unless you say, make a 300R instead of a 250R. Basically what I'm saying is 50cc can make a big differencee in some case, such as going big bore with a smaller cylinder, and in other cases it isn't going to make that much difference, I.E. Mojave v.s. 300ex. Understand what I'm saying?
