Honda Discussions about Honda ATVs.

Is ruby tranny completely waterproof

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 15, 2002 | 11:48 AM
  #1  
DanimalFL's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Range Rover
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Default

and if you drown the engine and water gets in the oil does it get in the tranny also just how bulletproof is this tranny if i ride in tons of water would a foreman 450 be better i have a 660 grizz and im tired of the water problems gonna sell it and get a 450S or ruby
 
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2002 | 12:07 PM
  #2  
450HondaForemanS's Avatar
Range Rover
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Default

Check on the Rubicon's speed before you buy one. I never raced one, but a dealer told me my 450S was faster due to the auto tranny on the Rubicon sucking up so much power unless you don't like shifting. I haven't verified this is true with any other source.
 
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2002 | 09:28 PM
  #3  
goattrotter's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
Default

Your dealer needs to get his head checked ! A Rubicon will kill a 450 es with ease.
 
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2002 | 11:29 PM
  #4  
TEXMud's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,458
Likes: 0
Default

The tranny is sealed. There are no breathers for it like a belt. The only way water can get in is for you to sink your quad. I have sunk mine big time and no problems.

The Rubicon is faster on the drag strip than a 450. Any day.
 
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2002 | 11:42 PM
  #5  
RINCON's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,618
Likes: 0
Default

I've heard the 450 puts out 1-2 more HP than the rubi, is it true???
 
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2002 | 01:03 AM
  #6  
TEXMud's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,458
Likes: 0
Default

In deep mud HP means nothing. Its all about torque. From what I remember both the 450 and Rubicon are at about 20-21 HP stock.
 
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2002 | 11:53 AM
  #7  
Specta's Avatar
Pro Rider
Loves riding and can't get enough.
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,949
Likes: 2
Default

I don't know why a dealer would tell you a 450 is faster than a Rubicon. I have several friends with 2001 and 2002 SP 500 HO's and I can out run half of them and the other half can out run me. We are only talking a few feet in a drag race. If you get water in the engine oil, it will end up in the trans. Otherwise, no water will ever enter the trans. The trans in the Rubicon is like 95% efficient, more than the style in automobiles and more than a belt drive.[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-happy.gif[/img]
 
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2002 | 11:58 AM
  #8  
Bisley's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Default

I have a Rubi and a 450 S. The Rubicon is much faster. That dealer is trying to move his 450's
 
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2002 | 12:04 PM
  #9  
RINCON's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,618
Likes: 0
Default

the 450 is a better buy, in canada my brother got his 450 for 6999, and the cheapest rubi is 8699, that's a lot more money for not a lot more quad
 
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2002 | 06:40 PM
  #10  
450HondaForemanS's Avatar
Range Rover
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Default

Not to be a pest, but are you guys comparing a Rubicon with a 2002 or newer 450S. My 2002 has 2wd selectable and I know for a fact that it is noticeably faster than an earlier 450 without 2wd option. The ruby should obviously have more power with a bigger engine and liquid cooling, but the 450 trans and 2wd should provide less drag. Just a thought.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:35 PM.