Honda Discussions about Honda ATVs.

Link vs. No-link. Which is better? Why?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 26, 2003 | 11:15 AM
  #1  
lt250500's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Weekend Warrior
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Default Link vs. No-link. Which is better? Why?

I have noticed that a lot of pro riders use a no-link rear suspension setup. Why is this? Does it handle better than the link setup? Is it more durable? What do you have to change to go from a link setup to a no-link setup. Thanks!
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2003 | 01:00 PM
  #2  
AlkyBurninX's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,850
Likes: 0
Default Link vs. No-link. Which is better? Why?

I race TT/flattrack with a banshee with no-link. On these types of tracks, no link hooks harder, weight transfer is much faster, it is easier to tune, and when lowered for flattrack, the link can bottom out. I simply welded a mount on the subframe and ran the other end of the shock goes directly to the swingarm where the link hooked up. I am running AFCO shocks which work great.

Look at dirtbikes. The high priced/high end bikes such as KTM use no link. Honda and yamaha use link systems still. This is because KTM uses better shocks to start with and the other use cheaper shocks. The link speeds up the shock shaft movement which causes more dampening on the shock. KTM's shocks automatically put more dampening in when the shaft moves at higher speeds. Also, you can run a shorter shock with the link system since the link creates a mechanical ratio. This lets the companies mount the shock lower in the frame for more room for an airbox and such. Look at the 250r. The top of the shock is mounted halfway up the engine. Honda could then put the airbox and snorkel over the shock.
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2003 | 01:26 PM
  #3  
lt250500's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Weekend Warrior
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Default Link vs. No-link. Which is better? Why?

I am building the 250R for MX. Which setup is better? Can you convert a stock frame to the no-link? How do you know if an aftermarket frame is setup for no-link?
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2003 | 04:55 PM
  #4  
theHulkamaniac's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Default Link vs. No-link. Which is better? Why?

As far as which is better; I think it's a matter of personal preference. Stock frames can be modified with a bracketraising the shock mount. If the aftermarket frame was no-link it would have the shock bracket up higher than factory.

Roll Design has a no-link swingarm which sets the shock further down in the swingarm. In order to give the shock room to travel. It is fairly costly, over $1000.00, but when you consider what it would take to modify your stock chassis, to a common, no-link design. It may not be so bad.

As with all no-link rear setups you will need a new aftermarket shock.
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2003 | 06:42 PM
  #5  
300exRiderJay's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
Default Link vs. No-link. Which is better? Why?

Can someone explain what the no link thing is? Is it the the setup the warrior has where the shock is not directly hooked up to the swingarm?
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2003 | 06:50 PM
  #6  
01TRX300EX's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
Default Link vs. No-link. Which is better? Why?

No, the Warrior has a linkage set up, the 300EX does not have a linkage set up since the shock is mounted directly to the swingarm.
 
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2003 | 06:42 PM
  #7  
300exRiderJay's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
Default Link vs. No-link. Which is better? Why?

thanks for clearing that up
 
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2003 | 06:46 PM
  #8  
KGB's Avatar
KGB
Pro Rider
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,687
Likes: 0
Default Link vs. No-link. Which is better? Why?

Weight is an issue too. Moslty its the fact that a no link shock is more expensive.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
salixair
Polaris
7
Nov 3, 2015 08:25 AM
cswiger
Polaris Side by Sides
12
Oct 5, 2015 03:34 PM
bigred20653
CAN-AM (BRP)
2
Oct 2, 2015 10:05 AM
1ArmBandit
Polaris
0
Sep 8, 2015 08:59 PM
JakeXBL
General Chat
8
Sep 5, 2015 01:08 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:00 PM.