Honda Discussions about Honda ATVs.

300EX vs Warror........?????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 20, 2000 | 09:34 AM
  #11  
balzie33's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Default

RVonSand,
you dont think that a warrior is light on jumps and trails. ok its a little heavier than the 300ex but thats not to say it cant jump as good. it is way more balanced in the air. I also have a blaster and i've cleared jumps on my warrior that my blaster cant clear. warriors are also more realiable my step dad had one for 10 years and the only thing we ever did to it was put new bearings in it.. so overall the warrior is the best quad....
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2000 | 12:05 PM
  #12  
rooster's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 672
Likes: 0
Default

I never could figure out why the 300EX would win every sport shootout it was in until I bought one. Yes, Warrior is faster for acceleration and top speed. I won't say for the rest of the categories cause I've never ridden a Warrior, but would like to. Basically, the 300EX will fit some people better and the Warrior others. Bigger persons will like the Warrior with its much larger size, and smaller will like the 300EX. That's probably the main selling point for all quads, it's what fits YOU right.

Balzie, that's a joke.

By the way, the 300EX is cheaper than the Warrior, so I think what people are getting at with the FMF pipe on the EX is that they could put that on the EX and still be at the cost of a stock Warrior.

[This message has been edited by rooster (edited 01-20-2000).]
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2000 | 12:49 PM
  #13  
RangerSX's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
Default

Just filling some of you guys in that are saying the 300EX is for smaller ppl. I am 6'1" 230 lbs. I ride a 87 250X, and i feel that it fits me perfectly! I have been on a warrior, nice quad, but they just dont feel like true sport quad, it felt just the same to me in the room available. well i will check you later.



------------------
RangerSX 1987 Honda 250X(completely stock)
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2000 | 02:02 PM
  #14  
quad_300ex's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Default

I agree a 300ex can be just as comfortable as a warror it just depends on what you like better Yamaha or HONDA Me myself like honda's better because I think thaqt they are more reliable then Yamaha but that my opinion.
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2000 | 02:08 PM
  #15  
RVonSand's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Default

Sorry. I had guy next door with 98 Warrior. I had 98 300EX - FMF pipe on Honda kicks ! Anyone with 4stroke either 250x 300ex or 400EX knows exactly what i mean. Best bang for the buck.
FMF on Warrior - is a dud. Waste of money. That is what my Warrior friend told me. Engines very different. Honda has alot of untapped power that is easily. Warrior improves top speed a little - Honda improves especially low/mid - you'll be shocked!
IF you want big and clunky and 'sofa' comfortable get Yamaha. IF you want sporty feel and light on the jumps/trails get Honda.
Thats it.
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2000 | 06:39 PM
  #16  
luv2ride's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Default

I just got a 00 300ex and I love it, it rides so smooth on the trails and it is real quik and zippy out of the turns, the suspension is a little bit better on the Honda too. If its power your looking for then the 300ex has plenty to offer!!
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bonzhonda300ex
TheATVSuperStore
0
Sep 17, 2015 01:21 PM
ScopeZ_
General Chat
3
Sep 13, 2015 07:55 AM
Wiley wolf
Introduce Yourself
3
Sep 7, 2015 08:32 PM
OutRacing
Technical and How-To Articles
5
Sep 3, 2015 07:49 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:47 PM.