What one is better 300ex,lakota,warrior
#5
well 2many here's what i think the warrior is the fastest.The 300ex isn't that far behind on speed and handles better.The lakota is almost identical to the 300ex in top speed,it may be 1-2mph slower and it handles as well as the 300ex and is cheapest,but is auto-clutch.There all good quads and really i would get the one that has the better deal.Also the mojave is like a lakota in every way except with a manual clutch and lighter,imo.
#6
Originally posted by: clover
well 2many here's what i think the warrior is the fastest.The 300ex isn't that far behind on speed and handles better.The lakota is almost identical to the 300ex in top speed,it may be 1-2mph slower and it handles as well as the 300ex and is cheapest,but is auto-clutch.There all good quads and really i would get the one that has the better deal.Also the mojave is like a lakota in every way except with a manual clutch and lighter,imo.
well 2many here's what i think the warrior is the fastest.The 300ex isn't that far behind on speed and handles better.The lakota is almost identical to the 300ex in top speed,it may be 1-2mph slower and it handles as well as the 300ex and is cheapest,but is auto-clutch.There all good quads and really i would get the one that has the better deal.Also the mojave is like a lakota in every way except with a manual clutch and lighter,imo.
all right here. the 300ex is manual. also the mojave is very close to the lokata, except for one thing, THE MOTOR. god the motor is way different and much faster. you must be a 300ex owner? becuase the warroir will pass the 300 in 4 or 5th gear, oh yes dont forget the warriors 6th gear.
Also my piped mojave (white bros) can stay with my friends warrior until he shifts to sixth.
if i where you go for the warrior, it is a great trail machine, as goes ith the kfx250.
#7
well fatguy i didn't even say the 300ex is auto clutch,it's manual clutch.Also i meant the mojave is like the lakota speed wise and handling except for the manual clutch and it being lighter.They are both around the same speed 52-54mph, i know this i own a lakota.Also theres no way a warrior is going to pass a 300ex in 4th gear i don't care who's driving the warrior.
Trending Topics
#9
i said out of those i would choose the warrior, but if i could i would definately take the mojave. it is a great all around quad and VERY underrated. awesome in the woods. the lakota is a mojave frame with a bayou 300 engine, racks, and a semi-auto clutch. the mojave is definatly faster than the lakota. it doesnt top out that much higher maybe a couple mph but it gets there a lot quicker which is almost more important. sounds like you got your polaris pretty modded out, how well does that thing run? jmo get the mojave and get new tires on the back take off that f*ckin air box it makes absolutely no sense at ALL. as soon as i get around to it im gonna get a clamp on and get rid of that stupid thing.
#10
My Polaris runs really well. It is very quick in the woods and climbs like crazy. It performs like a completely different quad with the mods. The 250,s have alot of potential. It just needs to be braught out. It will hang with a 400 scrammy till about 50-55 then the scrammy crawl on by. The top speed of the 250 is 65mph. Stock it is around 50mph. It handles great in the woods and the power is allways there. Not a great jumper but still ok for the weight. I just want a 4 stroke for a change. It will definately beat a stock warrior but it wont jump like one. I like the warrior and was considering a Mojave.


