Kawasaki Discussions about Kawasaki ATVs.

mojave vs. warrior

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 13, 2005 | 02:51 PM
  #1  
MOJAVEalltheway's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Range Rover
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Default mojave vs. warrior

wondering how much beeter is a warrior than a mojave, speed, handleing, stability, in the trails how much better is it?
 
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2005 | 05:09 PM
  #2  
fastblaster00's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
Default mojave vs. warrior

warrior will be beter + its got reverse adn the mojave dont. my friend has a mojave and he donest have to much trouble trail riding except he doesnt have reverse and if he stalls in mud he has to get his foot wet when he restarts it, and my dad dont with his warrior. warriors a better all around bike imo
 
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2005 | 05:19 PM
  #3  
kwackermann's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 2
Default mojave vs. warrior

Since when dod the mojave not have reverse? Mojaves always had reverse. On to the comparison now, the Warrior has a longer wheelbase so taler riders will be better accomodated. The Warrior has a 6spd transmission, the Mojave has 5. The warrior has electric start, the Mojave has kick. Depending on how tight the trails are is the deciding factor. The Mojaves is a wonder in tight places. Due also to it's 4- valve, liquid cooled engine it responds wonderfully to modifications. The Warrior is more docile with its' 2- calve, air cooled setup. Parts interchangeability with the Mojave is stellar, such as the rear shock from a TRX250R bolting right up, which can be had on ebay for a bargain. The Mojave was truely the unsung hero of the day.... [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif[/img]
 
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2005 | 05:27 PM
  #4  
clover's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 0
Default mojave vs. warrior

These two atv's perform close to the same,except the warrior has more topend speed.Also like kwackermann said the warrior has the extra room and electric start.Besides that there both about equal.
 
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2005 | 05:41 PM
  #5  
skii0's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
Default mojave vs. warrior

way better...[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-happy.gif[/img]
 
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2005 | 06:07 PM
  #6  
Jeffro31's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Default mojave vs. warrior

I prefer the mojave , it is a quick reving machine with lots of torque , handles good , real stable , it just need electric start but it cranks easy and as a note , the mojave has always had reverese , I owned one in 1989 but it was stolen.
 
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2005 | 12:15 PM
  #7  
Jayson440's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Default mojave vs. warrior

The warrior is a 350 and the mojave is 250 so you can't really compare the two that much. But of course the warrior is faster. But the mojave has always had reverse.
 
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2005 | 02:54 PM
  #8  
ranger696f's Avatar
Range Rover
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Default mojave vs. warrior

mojaves always have reverse unless some one took it out and its the only quad that has been known to beat 300cc classes mater of fact its still the quad that is ahead of the compition
 
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2005 | 08:51 PM
  #9  
KingRacing's Avatar
Range Rover
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Default mojave vs. warrior

i never Raced a mojave on my 300ex yet (cant wait to do it) but iv rode warriors and raced them (won some, lost some) and i heard good things about both. The warrior is a good quad in my opinion but it isnt the most comfortable....
 
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2005 | 01:15 AM
  #10  
Chris142's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 913
Likes: 1
Default mojave vs. warrior

Isn't the Warrier pretty heavy?
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:35 PM.