Pleas tell me how they are compared to other quads in ther class[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-happy.gif[/img]

 

Compare it to a 250ex and 300ex. It is about $2600 otd. Rear disc on a Blaster copy frame and suspension. From the factory, you must re-jet, change the air filter, change the clutch springs, change the gear box oil immediately. Beyond that, some real rims and tires and it is a good performer. Wiesco makes a 300cc kit.

Again, the Skyhawk 250 is a good machine for the money. If I recall correctly it is a green sticker for California where the Blaster is Red sticker. It is electric start and a 4 stroke. For the casual rider or as a back-up bike, it is just the ticket. I have one for testing and I have yet to find a real problem. Power wise, it compares with the 250 and 300ex Honda. If you plan on beating your machine to pieces, go with the Honda. If you have the ability to know the limitations of stock machines and want to save some $$, go with Kasea. If you want a smokey, kick start machine, go with the Blaster. Nuf Said.

 

I agree with Raptor [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/img]

 

raptor720 could you please tell me more about the handling,power and suspension of this quad.
Do you think this quad could handle a moderate mx trak without falling to peaces. One more thing do you think it would be possible to have this quad making around 40hp. THANX[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-happy.gif[/img]

 

Ronnie's Mail Order build up a really nice 250 last year. Suspension and frame is virtually the same as the Blaster. For Racing, I would change the a-arms to wider, add Nerfs, o-ring chain, air filter, clutch springs and exhaust. For more agressive mods, I would go with a head port, valve springs, cam and the Wiesco 300 kit.