I agree that Saddam was a threat in the present and definitely in the Future (had we gone the other way on this) but I also feel that first things first. I have all the confidence that Saddam would have been dealt with in due time. Bush went the other way with this, he goes after Saddam with weak information and goes to all out war. When all the evidence pointed to Bin Ladin.

 

What I dont like about chinny, is the way he can lie, and not even flinch when hes caught. He lied about never meeting edwards, when its very easy to prove that wrong. Yet he wount retract, or apoligized for lieing. If he lies this good about things we can prove....how can we trust him to not lie, when we cant prove it?
Even the senior members of the congress, are dumping on bush and chinny. So it isnt just the dems that dont like what theyre seeing. Heres the story
story
Even bremmer and rummy are bailing out. Theres got to be some reason why these insiders, are trashin the boss.

 

They should change it to www.exageration.com. Their game with "powerwords" is almost amusing.

 

agreed raptorlegs. Ive been allotta places with allotta people and i can tell you I have not officially met most of them. Hell i have been in bars and sat next to people and NOT MET THEM... I would say to meet someone that would classify you exchange some words and got a feel about who that person was. We all define things differently i guess. and you can spin anything to fit any agenda you desire to support.

 

OMG I cant believe This poor robots story [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-sad.gif[/img] Robots Job gets outsourced

 

Wow.. I thought I'd never agree with Bradracer18 on anything.. Give me a president that can make decisions, not a weathervane..

 

NJ......exactly....I looked in here(this is bad) just to see what you had to say, because I figured it wouldn't be the same as my thoughts.......wow I guess we do understand some of the same thoughts....

 

say all of you that say saddam was not a terriost ,he paid suicide bombers familys $25,000 if thats, not supporting terriosiom i don't know what is ... and bush did say we would go after them where ever they hid , or who ever supported them.. SSG.

 

All I can think about is IF Kerry was elected. And if he died (or was killed, etc), PRESIDENT EDWARDS?? NO THANKS!!!

 

Ok, one thing that people need to understand is that we never pasted up bin laden to go after saddam. we have had troops in afganastan sence day one. over 60% of alqueda has been takin out. most of bin ladens top generals have been captured or killed. We are still searching for him, hell I think he is most likely dead already.
But you see our liberal media only wants to tell you about the tragities in iraq, if you ever notice they try to make us look bad, IMO. Kerry wants to let other countries tell us when we can protect ourselves BS.


As far as taxes go, ok mr. kerry lets tax the crap out of the rich guys. ( have you ever been hired by a poor man) I didn't think so. Like somone else already noted, if you give corperations a break they will hire more people which makes them more money which in return those people have to pay taxes. It all works out that way. If you raise their taxes they hire less which kills their production which kills our economy.