who thinks they have the lowest quad here

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 12, 2006 | 10:57 PM
  #1  
getdrunk's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Pro Rider
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
Default who thinks they have the lowest quad here

my 400ex sits 4 inches off the ground with 20" front tires and 18" rears. im talking about the frame ground clearnce. is any one lower than mine. (talkin 250cc and up 4 stroke and 200cc and up 2 stroke) my quad can still be dropped another 2 inches if i wanted to do it.
 
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2006 | 06:31 PM
  #2  
counterpunch's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 887
Likes: 0
Default who thinks they have the lowest quad here

<<<<<<< 3.9 inches
 
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2006 | 07:16 PM
  #3  
powerismygame's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Default who thinks they have the lowest quad here

myn was - 6 inches once.


but it was under water.


Fred.
 
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2006 | 10:00 PM
  #4  
quadracer325's Avatar
Range Rover
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Default who thinks they have the lowest quad here

Wow, I had a banshee for a while that only had 7 or 8 inches of ground clearance and I thought that was low.
 
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2006 | 10:12 PM
  #5  
CobraR6's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,318
Likes: 0
Default who thinks they have the lowest quad here

Lol, and I have 9.7" and am trying to get more ground clearence.
 
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2006 | 10:19 PM
  #6  
CobraR6's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,318
Likes: 0
Default who thinks they have the lowest quad here

OH now I see why its so low, the tires are flat!!! Lol just kidding man!![img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/img][img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif[/img]
 
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2006 | 10:56 PM
  #7  
powerismygame's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Default who thinks they have the lowest quad here

they lower them for better traction around corners!



Fred.
 
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2006 | 12:29 AM
  #8  
CobraR6's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,318
Likes: 0
Default who thinks they have the lowest quad here

Yep, and I would raise mine to get more clearence in the Mud Hole![img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif[/img][img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/img]
 
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2006 | 11:28 AM
  #9  
Ginnis's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 799
Likes: 0
Default who thinks they have the lowest quad here

they lower them for better traction around corners!

------

Yep, and I would raise mine to get more clearence in the Mud Hole!

-----

Ahh the difference in riders. Anyhow, mine isn't worth doing anything to, it's gonna blow up while I'm riding one of these days and then boom, no more Ginnis.... such a loss, eh? [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/img]
 
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2006 | 09:51 PM
  #10  
dunbarr's Avatar
Elite Pro Rider
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,526
Likes: 0
Default who thinks they have the lowest quad here

Originally posted by: Ginnis
they lower them for better traction around corners!

------

Yep, and I would raise mine to get more clearence in the Mud Hole!

-----

Ahh the difference in riders. Anyhow, mine isn't worth doing anything to, it's gonna blow up while I'm riding one of these days and then boom, no more Ginnis.... such a loss, eh? [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/img]
exactly!...

9.1 and I want more otta my sport quad [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-happy.gif[/img][img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/img]?[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-shocked.gif[/img]
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:23 PM.