Recon Vs. Blaster
#4
i'd say a blaster. they are more lightweight, fun and easy to wheelie, and good jumpers. plus, there are way more mods you can do to a blaster (or any 2 stroke) to get going even faster. in a race it will beat a recon. it all depends on your needs though and what type of riding you do.
#5
Well, depends on what your going to do.
MX-Blaster
XC-Blaster
Hills- Blaster
Drag-Blaster
Utility- Recon
The Blaster is made to be a bike you can play around on and also be very competative. The Recond half sport half utility, in other words a sport/utilty
MX-Blaster
XC-Blaster
Hills- Blaster
Drag-Blaster
Utility- Recon
The Blaster is made to be a bike you can play around on and also be very competative. The Recond half sport half utility, in other words a sport/utilty
#7
I would choose the recon. I think that the blaster is very chinsy. I don't trust the mechanical brakes on it. I have never ridden a recon. But it is a Honda so I would choose it.
Trending Topics
#8
I would take the recon anyday over that 6 month lasting 2 stroke motor. The blaster might have a little more pep but when the recon is running 10 years down the rode and that 2 stroke need a rebuild which one is more fun now.
#9
Blaster is a emtremly reliable motor and even though its a 2-stroke you DON NOT have to rebuilf it ever 6 months. The only people that have to rebuild their motor ever 6 months are people that ride their atv extremly hard. Just because its a 2-stroke people assume the worst. State what you know, not what you guess.


