2 Strokes back agian?
#72
Originally posted by: BryceGTX
Now tell me who is the genius here??
Bryce
Now tell me who is the genius here??
Bryce
Now in smaller engines, like engines producing less than 10,000 hp, the transverse forces are tolerable. Because of this, a lighter weight bearing can be produced and used.
#75
Originally posted by: BryceGTX
LOL.. gee I hope it weighs less. I would hate to put a 100 ton motor on my quad. Might have to bump up the air pressure in the tires abit [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-happy.gif[/img]
LOL.. gee I hope it weighs less. I would hate to put a 100 ton motor on my quad. Might have to bump up the air pressure in the tires abit [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-happy.gif[/img]
#77
Well the basic technology of the bearings is not new. However they are not exactly the same, and are not being used for the same purpose. They are being incorporated into the "new technology"
It's kind of like looking at an ignition system on a car 50 years ago and comparing it to todays modern car ignitions. They both do the same thing, but they are quite a bit different.
It's kind of like looking at an ignition system on a car 50 years ago and comparing it to todays modern car ignitions. They both do the same thing, but they are quite a bit different.
#79
Originally posted by: BryceGTX
I see, then explain to all of us how a crosshead bearing engine is going to create a higher HP, lower weight engine than say a typical 120 hp, 600 cc sled engine?
I see, then explain to all of us how a crosshead bearing engine is going to create a higher HP, lower weight engine than say a typical 120 hp, 600 cc sled engine?
I have just been commenting on some information about the possible future of this new 2 stroke technolgy. I am not personally building or developing this technology. So I can not tell you if it will perform as good or better than todays 2 strokes. But from what I have read so far, it sounds like it will. Now keep in mind just because they are doing r&d on this design does not mean that this is what they are going to use. Some of the information that I have read has been fascinating though.
#80
I would be more interested in your discussion if you presented any technical argument how this engine could even produce as much hp as the typical 600cc sled motor. But you haven't. On the other hand I have presented a technical argument why it will not produce as much power for equivalent weight and displacement. LOL.. your response is that I am not knowledgeable about the subject. Interesting point, but a pretty lame argument. Even this latest post is vague and without content.
Bryce
Bryce


