Sport Quads Discussions on sport quads.

another "which is faster" thread (cheap bikes)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 7, 2004 | 11:38 PM
  #1  
rider4life's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Weekend Warrior
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Default another "which is faster" thread (cheap bikes)

im gottin a sport bike soon. it looks like the nicer bikes (raptor, yfz, v-force...) are too pricey, so now im looking at cheaper bikes.

300ex
blaster
warrior
mojave
lakota
quadzilla (quadracer, whatever)

i know its more about what your comfortable with, whatevers best for you..., ive read it all, but it seems in my case that price matters more than comfort. i want a fast bike for about 1500-2000 dollars. hoping to find an older model bike that still has some pep. what do you suggest?
 
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2004 | 11:49 PM
  #2  
Spanxkx's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Default another "which is faster" thread (cheap bikes)

well to start, out of your list, you will have the best luck as far as being reliable with the 300ex, and fairly cheap. the quadzilla and quadracer are two different machines, one is a 500 (zilla) and 250 is the quadracer both fast, but will take more money to keep up because of being a two stroke. Warrior is a good choice, moderately fast, trusty, and been around for a while which means its old technology. blaster is another 2 stroke, pretty fast. mojave is outdated. wont even comment on lakota [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-happy.gif[/img] out of your choices, i would prolly go with a 300ex. Isnt the fastest, but it is bullet proof and will always start if it has been taken care of. Good trail bike, and many after market parts to buy for it to make it faster if speed is what you want. good luck

luke
 
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2004 | 11:53 PM
  #3  
Supergumby5000's Avatar
Range Rover
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Default another "which is faster" thread (cheap bikes)

out of those choices, definately a 300ex or warrior, havent had any experience on a 300ex, but my cousin has a warrior from like 1989 i think, somewhere around there, and its still running just fine.
 
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2004 | 11:58 PM
  #4  
tryintoohard's Avatar
Range Rover
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Default another "which is faster" thread (cheap bikes)

warrior is a great quad and you should be able to find a good used one for around 2000.
 
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2004 | 12:12 AM
  #5  
farmboyxc's Avatar
Range Rover
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Default another "which is faster" thread (cheap bikes)

mojave was my first sportish quad, and w/ a dg pipe, 14/37 gearing, 20/11/10 razors, and wide offset fronts, it was quite the bang for the buck. but ya gotta kick it, but choking and full throttle will make anything start. and i've yet to see a green and purple 300ex. chix dig it. oh, btw, dual overhead cam tech in the engine is what sold me on it. awesome power for the size being a four-stroke.
 
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2004 | 10:31 PM
  #6  
roosthrower's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,441
Likes: 0
Default another "which is faster" thread (cheap bikes)

quadzilla if you can find one in that price range. I bought my 87 banshee for $2000. It had mods too. But it needed a new top end.
 
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2004 | 08:48 PM
  #7  
WheelieKing's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,088
Likes: 0
Default another "which is faster" thread (cheap bikes)

i'd say prolly go with blaster. there quick, light, and only like 1500 for a late model in good conditoin. but it might be too small. take a blaster for a spin and see if its to small. i'm 5-11 and feel cramped on a blaster but i can still rip through trails on one.[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/img]
 
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2004 | 08:49 PM
  #8  
WheelieKing's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,088
Likes: 0
Default another "which is faster" thread (cheap bikes)

i forgot to mention that they are prolly the most reliable 2-stroke ever made!!!!
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2004 | 02:49 AM
  #9  
DieScarred's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,405
Likes: 0
Default another "which is faster" thread (cheap bikes)

Yeah I would reccomend a Blaster too. Quick, light and easy to throw around, cheap, and you still get that 2-stroke feeling [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/img]
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2004 | 04:23 AM
  #10  
rider4life's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Weekend Warrior
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Default another "which is faster" thread (cheap bikes)

i think ill look at the 300ex's. after further review, i see they fit my needs best. reverse is necessary. the wheeelie well. not really looking to drag.

thanks for the help




peace
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Firefighter400
Test Your Signatures (sigs) Here!
2
Oct 8, 2022 06:38 PM
Ramman1
Kids Quads
5
Aug 11, 2022 01:53 PM
toonces
Buying an ATV
1
Aug 6, 2015 10:46 AM
Bulgin88
Introduce Yourself
1
Aug 1, 2015 06:39 PM
Sandman2.0
Polaris
9
Jul 21, 2015 09:03 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:43 PM.