blaster vs. z250
#14
Didn't I already see this discussion a few weeks ago? Oh yeah, now I remember, roostthrower started it, got shut down, threw a tantrim, and gave up. Why people insist on comparing a 200 2-stroke to 250 4-stroke is beyond me. Isn't it a general rule of thumb that a 4-stroke of 2x the cc of a 2-stroke is competitive? That's why 250f's race in the 125cc div. and 450f's race in the 250cc div., right? So, based on that, let's compare a blaster and a z400. Or at least a blaster and a warrior. Either way, it's closer to the 200 2-stroke level of competition. But wait, the blaster can't compete stock with either of them cuz it's a P.O.S. for what it is. Yamaha could put a little R&D into the blaster and make an awesome little racing machine, but unfortunately 2-strokes are being phased out so they won't. Too bad, so sad, get over it and next time someone wants to compare the blaster to a 4-stroke try picking on someone your own size you bully. Or are you chicken?! Warrior 65mph stock, Z400 70mph stock, so step on up and get smoked!
#16
first of all let's compare the prices of the warrior, z400, and the blaster. The warrior is like $4600, the z is $5000 and the blaster is $3000 grand. If you spent 2 grand hopping up a blaster it would smoke a stock z and totally demolish a stock warrior. Now the z250 is like 3800 new and with $800 dollars you save by getting a blaster you could kill the ozark with sport plastic.
#17
CraZ400, I don't think roosthrower got your point. Now he is going back to the money and modification thing. Man oh man, some people just never learn.[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-disgusted.gif[/img]
#20
jackknife, i ride in southern lowndes county and in northern fl. river trails and a pit were the county gets there dirt for construction. we also ride in a closed landfill. we are planning a trip to albany this fall.


