Suzuki Discussions about Suzuki ATVs.

blaster vs. z250

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 27, 2003 | 11:30 PM
  #11  
mahnster's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 883
Likes: 0
Default blaster vs. z250

or with an 50 mph wind behind him
 
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2003 | 11:36 PM
  #12  
jackknife's Avatar
Range Rover
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Default blaster vs. z250

woooooo manster is a funny guy I would like to shake his hand
 
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2003 | 12:20 AM
  #13  
SuzukiZ250Kid's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 714
Likes: 0
Default blaster vs. z250

The Blaster is faster, but I think the Z could handle jumps better. And the Z is definately faster on tighter wooded trails.
 
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2003 | 01:26 AM
  #14  
craZ400's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
Default blaster vs. z250

Didn't I already see this discussion a few weeks ago? Oh yeah, now I remember, roostthrower started it, got shut down, threw a tantrim, and gave up. Why people insist on comparing a 200 2-stroke to 250 4-stroke is beyond me. Isn't it a general rule of thumb that a 4-stroke of 2x the cc of a 2-stroke is competitive? That's why 250f's race in the 125cc div. and 450f's race in the 250cc div., right? So, based on that, let's compare a blaster and a z400. Or at least a blaster and a warrior. Either way, it's closer to the 200 2-stroke level of competition. But wait, the blaster can't compete stock with either of them cuz it's a P.O.S. for what it is. Yamaha could put a little R&D into the blaster and make an awesome little racing machine, but unfortunately 2-strokes are being phased out so they won't. Too bad, so sad, get over it and next time someone wants to compare the blaster to a 4-stroke try picking on someone your own size you bully. Or are you chicken?! Warrior 65mph stock, Z400 70mph stock, so step on up and get smoked!
 
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2003 | 01:59 AM
  #15  
blindside350's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,287
Likes: 0
Default blaster vs. z250

Come on come on stop it every time i look around its the same question of course the blaster goes faster but doesn't meen its the best quad ride the quad you like period
 
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2003 | 10:06 AM
  #16  
roosthrower's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,441
Likes: 0
Default blaster vs. z250

first of all let's compare the prices of the warrior, z400, and the blaster. The warrior is like $4600, the z is $5000 and the blaster is $3000 grand. If you spent 2 grand hopping up a blaster it would smoke a stock z and totally demolish a stock warrior. Now the z250 is like 3800 new and with $800 dollars you save by getting a blaster you could kill the ozark with sport plastic.
 
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2003 | 10:55 AM
  #17  
SuzukiZ250Kid's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 714
Likes: 0
Default blaster vs. z250

CraZ400, I don't think roosthrower got your point. Now he is going back to the money and modification thing. Man oh man, some people just never learn.[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-disgusted.gif[/img]
 
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2003 | 11:36 AM
  #18  
roosthrower's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,441
Likes: 0
Default blaster vs. z250

If the blaster wasn't tuned down from the factory so much it might be competitive with a 400cc fourstroke.
 
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2003 | 10:25 PM
  #19  
JactUpVinson's Avatar
Range Rover
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Default blaster vs. z250

I hate puttin down zuks, but lets see a manual 200 snappy 2 stroke or a auto 250 4-stroke. THats a no brainer the Blaster.
 
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2003 | 10:43 PM
  #20  
outNfront's Avatar
Range Rover
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Default blaster vs. z250

jackknife, i ride in southern lowndes county and in northern fl. river trails and a pit were the county gets there dirt for construction. we also ride in a closed landfill. we are planning a trip to albany this fall.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:20 AM.