Lt250R or Banshee350
Sep 27, 2003 | 03:26 PM
#1
Thread Starter
|
Range Rover
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Lt250R or Banshee350
hello guyz i wanna know what is a faster quad ... a *STOCK* LT250R OR a *STOCK* (yes stock!) Banshee?
plz ignore the fact that you prefer yamy/suzuki .. cuz i need to know what is a faster stock quad
and the top end of those stock quads...
thnx!
plz ignore the fact that you prefer yamy/suzuki .. cuz i need to know what is a faster stock quad
and the top end of those stock quads...
thnx!
Sep 28, 2003 | 05:52 PM
#6
Thread Starter
|
Range Rover
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Lt250R or Banshee350
how can you guyz explain the fact that a shee got 2 carbs 2 cylinders!!! 350 2 stroke
and its not that fast as it sounds like
i wonder to myself a 2 cylinder 350cc 2 stroke quad must be a darn fast quad to beat anything!
and other say it can barely win a lt250
and its not that fast as it sounds like
i wonder to myself a 2 cylinder 350cc 2 stroke quad must be a darn fast quad to beat anything!
and other say it can barely win a lt250
Trending Topics
Sep 28, 2003 | 07:53 PM
#8
Range Rover
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Lt250R or Banshee350
Remeber, because the 350 shee is lacking an exhaust valve, the power is going to hit at 4500RPM. With the '87 or newer suz, the power will hit close to 1000 RPM lower, allowing for there to be less shifting, and faster holeshots out of corners.
Sep 28, 2003 | 11:06 PM
#10
Pro Rider
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 322
Likes: 1
Lt250R or Banshee350
Did you post this in the shee forum also? I would have to guess that the shee is faster because there is no replacement for cubic inches. I am thinking if it weren't faster, why would all those people buy them when it cost twice as much to upgrade them.