warrior vs z250
#11
These 2 machines arent even in the same class. I have no idea why you are even trying to compare these. Z is a entry level 250. the warrior can be used as a entry level quad. It has 100ccs more than a Z.
#12
what would u rather me ask witch is better 250ex or z who cares if ther not in the same class if a z can almost keep up with a 300ex and a 300ex can keep up with a warior than they cant be that fare apart mabey in the drag race but wood the z would be up there what about blaster ther in a diffrent class and people ask bout them and 300ex
#14
stock
the warrior has a top speed of around 60 - 62 mph
and the z 250 has around 54 - 55 mph
When i had my stock lt 230 my top end was 48 mph on gps and that was with 25 inch tires on the back with stock gearing .
the warrior has a top speed of around 60 - 62 mph
and the z 250 has around 54 - 55 mph
When i had my stock lt 230 my top end was 48 mph on gps and that was with 25 inch tires on the back with stock gearing .
#16
the blaster, 300ex, and the mojave are all in the same class. the warrior is only one small step above these stock for stock. a piped mojave, 300ex, and blaster would leave a warrior behind. the 250ex and the z250 are in there own class. these bikes even piped aren't comparable to the power of a blaster, 300ex, or mojave stock.
#17
roosetr dude why dont you go to the yamaha frums and talk about your fruity little blaster cause none of us in the suzuki forum want to hearabout your blaster i bet my piped z250 will whoop your tail i just whooped a blasters tail the other day their stupid they dont have reverse and you have to kick start the darn thing thats stupid
#18
HEY 'PICKPOCKET!" your piped 250 will not beat his blaster, a hopped up blaster is pretty damn fast. there stupid because they dont have reverse, and there kick start?! i guess than then that new trx450r is stupid because it has no reverse and is a kickstart, and also the yfz450, 400ex, and the 250r are all stupid too, because none of them have reverse. its too bad his fruity little blaster will beat your 250( no offense my fellow suzuki guys) all that roosthrower was saying that its not even in the same class, THERE NOT COMPARABLE, GET OVER IT.....all of you kids!
--------------------
2003 Z400-dg nerfs, renthal bars
--------------------
2003 Z400-dg nerfs, renthal bars
#19
no offense to anyone but i think the warriors suck @ss! After a while they turn into POS's! 2 of my freinds have them and they are dumps, they sit too low after a while and everyting starts clanking. The z250 is way better, the z is awsome! Anyone agree?
#20
roosetr dude why dont you go to the yamaha frums and talk about your fruity little blaster cause none of us in the suzuki forum want to hearabout your blaster i bet my piped z250 will whoop your tail i just whooped a blasters tail the other day their stupid they dont have reverse and you have to kick start the darn thing thats stupid


