whats better the 2006 z250 or the 2006 250ex?
#11
01-04-2006, 10:11 PM
#12
01-04-2006, 10:12 PM
whats better the 2006 z250 or the 2006 250ex?
the honda clutch pretty much makes the bike a full manual quad, but only you cant stall it...the z250 clutch enables you to choose whether you want to use the clutch or shift like an electric clutch...trust me i've rode/raced many a 250 ex and smoked every single one of them...go with the z it's made way better than the 250 ex
#14
01-06-2006, 11:55 PM
#15
01-07-2006, 04:27 PM
whats better the 2006 z250 or the 2006 250ex?
Why dont you go and ask this in the honda forum and find out what they say.IMO i wouldnt get either of them.I would get the blaster over those 2 piles.If you went to the honda forum then they would say 250ex because everyone is loyal to their brand and they dont want to bash it.The blaster blows them away anyway.The only downside to the blaster is no reverse.
#16
01-07-2006, 04:41 PM
whats better the 2006 z250 or the 2006 250ex?
alright faster than you 22 you said that honda would say honda, but then again youre a yamaha kid that just said yamaha so just shut the f**k up the suzuki is waaaay better than the honda and blaster, the blaster only beats it by like 1/2 a quad length
#17
01-07-2006, 11:16 PM
whats better the 2006 z250 or the 2006 250ex?
The only thing good that the Blaster has going good for it in my opinion is that it is 2-stroke so its got better acceleration and the top speed is faster than the 250cc 4-strokes. Other than that, both 250's have better suspension, higher ground clearance, better handling, etc. In all honesty, I believe the Suzuki AND Honda are BOTH good quads. The performance and handling is very similar with the Suzuki being slightly better in all areas.
#18
01-08-2006, 12:30 AM
whats better the 2006 z250 or the 2006 250ex?
Originally posted by: SuzukiZ250Kid
The only thing good that the Blaster has going good for it in my opinion is that it is 2-stroke so its got better acceleration and the top speed is faster than the 250cc 4-strokes. Other than that, both 250's have better suspension, higher ground clearance, better handling, etc. In all honesty, I believe the Suzuki AND Honda are BOTH good quads. The performance and handling is very similar with the Suzuki being slightly better in all areas.
The only thing good that the Blaster has going good for it in my opinion is that it is 2-stroke so its got better acceleration and the top speed is faster than the 250cc 4-strokes. Other than that, both 250's have better suspension, higher ground clearance, better handling, etc. In all honesty, I believe the Suzuki AND Honda are BOTH good quads. The performance and handling is very similar with the Suzuki being slightly better in all areas.
#19
01-08-2006, 04:58 PM
whats better the 2006 z250 or the 2006 250ex?
i would suggest checking in the honda forum too, but the z250 is a good quad, if yyou want speed the blaster is a little faster, but you might want to check out the 300ex too. and the z not having a clutch is sometimes good when your on trails IMO.
#20
10-09-2006, 11:02 PM
Guest
Posts: n/a