raptors and yfz's getting the beatdown!!!
#45
[quote]
Originally posted by: DaBeechMan
sixsixty-there is no "forumla" for how a 4-stroke should equate to match up with a 2-stroke. cc for cc 2-strokes are just better at making power. I dont care about how often a 2-stroke creates a "power stroke" compared to a 4-stroke. q]
Check out AMA motox rules they allow 2 times the cc for a 4 stroke and it seems to work out about right. The 2 stokes still have a weight advantage tho.
Originally posted by: DaBeechMan
sixsixty-there is no "forumla" for how a 4-stroke should equate to match up with a 2-stroke. cc for cc 2-strokes are just better at making power. I dont care about how often a 2-stroke creates a "power stroke" compared to a 4-stroke. q]
Check out AMA motox rules they allow 2 times the cc for a 4 stroke and it seems to work out about right. The 2 stokes still have a weight advantage tho.
#46
2 Smokes always have and probably always will make more power than 4 strokes.......everyone knows that.......
that is why your *Little* 265 will probably out run a 690 rappy........
but dose that make the raptor a bad quad?......NO.....because it doesn't sound like a over grown weed wacker?
that is why your *Little* 265 will probably out run a 690 rappy........
but dose that make the raptor a bad quad?......NO.....because it doesn't sound like a over grown weed wacker?
#50
Dabeech,
You've seen the 400ex framed CRF450 equiped quad run at Pismo yes? You've commented as if you had. I'm sure you lined up with it on one or more of your quads. How did it/you fare in those races?
You've seen the 400ex framed CRF450 equiped quad run at Pismo yes? You've commented as if you had. I'm sure you lined up with it on one or more of your quads. How did it/you fare in those races?


