219 FT LBS???
#11
02-24-2004, 12:35 PM
#12
02-24-2004, 01:31 PM
219 FT LBS???
Originally posted by: Ward660R
I apologise ahead of time for this cheap shot at Dune Me.[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif[/img]
You don't think that you have a big enough one already? You riding a DS has to count for a pretty big handicap.LOL J/K
I deffinately agree with what is being said. Don't try and use your numbers for increasing your ego, because more often than not you'll be let down.
I apologise ahead of time for this cheap shot at Dune Me.[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif[/img]
Originally posted by: DuneMe
Think of it this way. If you race someone that has a 60 HP bike and beat them you can say you only have 48.5 HP and they must be a bad rider [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif[/img] I'ld rather have a larger handicap.
Think of it this way. If you race someone that has a 60 HP bike and beat them you can say you only have 48.5 HP and they must be a bad rider [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif[/img] I'ld rather have a larger handicap.
I deffinately agree with what is being said. Don't try and use your numbers for increasing your ego, because more often than not you'll be let down.
#13
02-24-2004, 04:23 PM
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
219 FT LBS???
I didn't get a print out so I can't tell what the numbers are at 5150 but I can guarantee torque and hp are the same. The a/f ratio was 14.7-1 at 1/3 to full throttle and would go lean at idle. The place that did the work assured me the lean idle was nothing to worry about. I was running VP C12 50/50 with 91 pump. I have since tried the VP ultimate four 102 octane which I don't think is worth the extra money. As far as hadicapped braging rights, I can pretty much spank faster quads at the dunes provided the hill is short and the whoops are ugly.
