350 warrior pros/cons
#5
when i had mine i was racing it at the local track i lost every race the suspension was soooo bad u lose lotz a time if u want sumthing more suited fer a track id say ne of the 400's or 450 or a 250r after i got my trx im lik amazing im only 14 racing against 18+
#7
I just bought one today and from the small time i was riding i can tell you its very fun, it has the perfect mix of power and rideability. Its not insanely fast like my friends banshee, has more ***** then the other 2 bikes i ride with, a blaster and a 300ex. Its definetly not for track, its a trail bike, something to have fun on, if you want to race get a yzf 450.
Trending Topics
#8
Tell you what man, i have never seen a quad as reliable as a warrior. My friends have mostly two strokes, like blasters, banshees and polaris quads, and always seem to be pulled apart. I dont know many people with old four-strokes, but my warrior has seen a lot of bad times, and always pulled out without any major problems. They are very strong quads(when you learn how to use its top end hp to your advantage) but nothing like a 400 ex or above. It has just enough power to launch you through the trails and not flip you over in the process. They are just a great getaway quad. Not so much a racer, but when driven right, can be quite a good competitor.
#9
i've had mine for a year now put ALOT of hours on it.. i don't change the oil as often as i should but it still keeps kickin. we are actually looking at this OTHER 2003 warrior up by me for 3200 has 20hrs i hope it's relaiable as the one i got...
#10
My warrior has been trouble-free for me and runs great. Probably not a competitive racer, but a nice sporty type for the farm or recreational riding. Ease of maintenance/ownership and fun is what the Warrior is all about. Parts seem to be much less epensive for Warriors too...


